46-18-305. Effect of aggravating and mitigating circumstances. In determining whether to impose a sentence of death or imprisonment, the court shall take into account the aggravating and mitigating circumstances enumerated in 46-18-303 and 46-18-304 and shall impose a sentence of death if the trier of fact found beyond a reasonable doubt, or the defendant pleaded guilty to the offense and admitted to, one or more aggravating circumstances and the court finds that there are no mitigating circumstances sufficiently substantial to call for leniency. If the court does not impose a sentence of death and one of the aggravating circumstances listed in 46-18-303 exists, the court may impose a sentence of imprisonment for life or for any term authorized by the statute defining the offense.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-305 (2026)
Effect Of Aggravating And Mitigating Circumstances
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 46. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 18. SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT
Part 3. Death Penalty
Effect Of Aggravating And Mitigating Circumstances
History: En. 95-2206.10 by Sec. 5, Ch. 338, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 95-2206.10; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 154, L. 2003.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases, 1979–2004 · leading case: State v. Coleman, 605 P.2d 1000 (Mont. 1979).
State v. Coleman, 605 P.2d 1000 (Mont. 1979). “1947, now section 46-18-305 MCA, instructs the sentencing court to take into account the aggravating and mitigating circumstances enumerated in sections 95-2206.”
State v. Smith, 931 P.2d 1272 (Mont. 1996). “Section 46-18-305, MCA. When a death sentence is imposed, the court must make specific written findings as to the existence or nonexistence of each aggravating or mitigating circumstance set forth in §§ 46-18-303 and -304, MCA.”
Coleman v. State, 633 P.2d 624 (Mont. 1981). “" (Section 46-18-305, MCA.) Under the above quoted statutes the death penalty is imposed if there is an aggravating circumstance and mitigating circumstances do not call for leniency.”
State v. Sattler, 1998 MT 57 (Mont. 1998). “Section 46-18-305, MCA. Thus, the District Court in this case was statutorily required to sentence Sattler to death upon the finding of the single aggravating circumstance that he previously had been convicted of a deliberate homicide and the absence of mitigating circumstances…”
Fitzpatrick v. State, 638 P.2d 1002 (Mont. 1981). “Section 46-18-305, MCA, provides that “the court.”
State v. Lester Kills on Top, 787 P.2d 336 (Mont. 1990). “It is provided in § 46-18-305, MCA, that the District Court in determining whether to impose a sentence of death or imprisonment "shall take into account the aggravating and mitigating circumstances enumerated in § 46-18-303, MCA, and § 46-18-304, MCA, and shall impose a…”
State v. Dawson, 761 P.2d 352 (Mont. 1988). “Does Section 46-18-305, MCA, violate the Eighth Amendment? 11.”
Kills on Top v. State, 901 P.2d 1368 (Mont. 1995). “Issue 16 Does Montana’s death penalty scheme unconstitutionally prohibit the sentencer from considering a single mitigating factor sufficient to merit leniency? Appellant contends that § 46-18-305, MCA, violates the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments’ prohibitions against imposing…”
State v. Keith, 754 P.2d 474 (Mont. 1988). “Section 46-18-305, MCA, states in part: “In determining whether to impose a sentence of death or imprisonment, the court shall take into account the aggravating and mitigating circumstances enumerated in 46-18-303 and 46-18-304 and shall impose a sentence of death if it finds…”
State v. Vern Kills on Top, 793 P.2d 1273 (Mont. 1990). “Section 46-18-305, MCA. Thus our statues provide for sentencing that is guided yet individualized.”
State v. Smith, 863 P.2d 1000 (Mont. 1993). “The aggravating factors set forth in 5 46-18-303, MCA, are independent of each other.”
State v. Smith, 705 P.2d 1087 (Mont. 1985). “” Section 46-18-305, MCA. Defendant contends there was evidence of mitigating factors present and the District Court did not give proper consideration to evidence when making its findings, conclusions and when rendering judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.