Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104 (2026)

Statewide System -- Structure And Scope Of Services -- Assignment Of Counsel At Public Expense

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 47. ACCESS TO LEGAL SERVICES

CHAPTER 1. STATEWIDE PUBLIC DEFENDER SYSTEM

Part 1. General

Statewide System -- Structure And Scope Of Services -- Assignment Of Counsel At Public Expense

47-1-104. Statewide system -- structure and scope of services -- assignment of counsel at public expense. (1) There is a statewide public defender system, which is required to deliver public defender services in all courts in this state. The system is supervised by the director. The director must be an attorney licensed to practice law in the state.

(2) The director shall approve a strategic plan for service delivery and establish not more than 11 public defender regions. The director may establish a regional office to provide public defender services in each region as provided in 47-1-215 for nonconflict regions and as provided in 47-1-403 for conflict regions, establish a contracted services program to provide services in the region, or utilize other service delivery methods as appropriate and consistent with the purposes described in 47-1-102.

(3) When a court orders the assignment of a public defender, the appropriate office shall immediately assign a public defender qualified to provide the required services. The director shall establish protocols to ensure that the offices make appropriate assignments in a timely manner.

(4) A court may order assignment of a public defender under this chapter in the following cases:

(a) in cases in which a person is entitled to assistance of counsel at public expense because of financial inability to retain private counsel, subject to a determination of indigence pursuant to 47-1-111, as follows:

(i) for a person charged with a felony or charged with a misdemeanor for which there is a possibility of incarceration, as provided in 46-8-101;

(ii) for a party in a proceeding to determine parentage under the Uniform Parentage Act, as provided in 40-6-119;

(iii) for an applicant for sentence review pursuant to Title 46, chapter 18, part 9;

(iv) for a petitioner in a proceeding for postconviction relief, as provided in 46-21-201;

(v) for a petitioner in a habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to Title 46, chapter 22;

(vi) for a parent or guardian in a proceeding for the involuntary commitment of a developmentally disabled person to a residential facility, as provided in 53-20-112;

(vii) for a witness in a criminal grand jury proceeding, as provided in 46-4-304; and

(viii) for a parent in a proceeding to involuntarily terminate the parent's parental rights pursuant to 42-2-607;

(b) in cases in which a person is entitled by law to the assistance of counsel at public expense regardless of the person's financial ability to retain private counsel, as follows:

(i) as provided for in 41-3-425;

(ii) for a youth in a proceeding under the Montana Youth Court Act alleging a youth is delinquent or in need of intervention, as provided in 41-5-1413, and in a prosecution under the Extended Jurisdiction Prosecution Act, as provided in 41-5-1607;

(iii) for a juvenile entitled to assigned counsel in a proceeding under the Interstate Compact on Juveniles, as provided in 41-6-101;

(iv) for a minor who petitions for a waiver of parental consent requirements under the Parental Consent for Abortion Act of 2013, as provided in 50-20-509;

(v) for a respondent in a proceeding for the involuntary commitment of a developmentally disabled person to a residential facility, as provided in 53-20-112;

(vi) for a minor voluntarily committed to a mental health facility, as provided in 53-21-112;

(vii) for a person who is the subject of a petition for the appointment of a guardian or conservator in a proceeding under the provisions of the Uniform Probate Code in Title 72, chapter 5;

(viii) for a ward when the ward's guardian has filed a petition to require medical treatment for a mental disorder of the ward, as provided in 72-5-322;

(ix) for a parent, guardian, or other person with physical or legal custody of a child or youth in any removal, placement, or termination proceeding pursuant to 41-3-422 and as required under the federal Indian Child Welfare Act and 41-3-1316, as provided in 41-3-425;

(x) for a respondent in a proceeding for involuntary commitment for a mental disorder, as provided in 53-21-116; and

(xi) for a respondent in a proceeding for the involuntary commitment of a person for alcoholism, as provided in 53-24-302; and

(c) for an eligible appellant in an appeal of a proceeding listed in this subsection (4).

(5) A court may also order assignment of a public defender to serve as a member of a treatment court team established pursuant to 46-1-1104 or 46-1-1204.

(6) (a) Except as provided in subsection (6)(b), a public defender may not be assigned to act as a court-appointed special advocate or guardian ad litem in a proceeding under the Montana Youth Court Act, Title 41, chapter 5, or in an abuse and neglect proceeding under Title 41, chapter 3.

(b) A private attorney who is contracted with under the provisions of this title to provide public defender services under this chapter may be appointed as a court-appointed special advocate or guardian ad litem in a proceeding described in subsection (6)(a) if the appointment is separate from the attorney's service for the statewide public defender system and does not result in a conflict of interest.

History: En. Sec. 4, Ch. 449, L. 2005; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 24, L. 2011; amd. Sec. 11, Ch. 307, L. 2011; amd. Sec. 13, Ch. 307, L. 2013; amd. Sec. 21, Ch. 358, L. 2017; amd. Sec. 53, Ch. 716, L. 2023; amd. Sec. 5, Ch. 228, L. 2025; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 690, L. 2025.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2008–2022 · leading case: State v. Items of Real Prop. Owned &/or Possessed by Chilinski, 2016 MT 280 (Mont. 2016).
State v. Items of Real Prop. Owned &/or Possessed by Chilinski, 2016 MT 280 (Mont. 2016). · cites it 3× “Section 47-1-104, MCA. 3 We recognize and have considered the rationale of those states finding there was no right to trial by jury in civil in rem forfeiture proceedings, namely: North Dakota, Minnesota, North Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Michigan, and Alabama have found a…”
State v. Zlahn, 2014 MT 224 (Mont. 2014). · cites it 5× “Section 47-1-104(3), MCA, provides: “When a court orders the office [of the public defender] or the office of appellate defender to assign counsel, the appropriate office shall immediately assign a public defender qualified to provide the required services.”
In Re the Guardianship & Conservatory of A.M.M., 2015 MT 250 (Mont. 2015). · cites it 3× “” Section 47-1-104(4)(b)(vii), MCA. Thus, while it seems unusual for the public defender to be involved in a case like this, the Court correctly concludes that the District Court was authorized to appoint the public defender to represent A.”
Off. of the State Pub. Def. v. Montana Eighteenth Jud. Dist. Court, 2011 MT 97 (Mont. 2011). · cites it 3× “¶4 Section 47-1-104(4)(a)(v), MCA, upon which the District Court has relied in part for its position, allows a district court to order OPD to assign counsel to a petitioner in a proceeding for postconviction relief “as provided in 46-21-201.”
Christopher Kenton Dyer v. Mahoney, 2008 MT 117 (Mont. 2008). · cites it 5× “Section 47-1-104(4)(a)(vi), MCA. In such proceedings, appointment of OSPD is optional but is not mandated, as is the case for those proceedings outlined in ¶ 3.”
Lance v. State, 2018 MT 23N (Mont. 2018). · cites it 11× “Section 47-1-104(3), MCA, states, “When a court orders the assignment of a public defender, the appropriate office shall immediately assign a public defender qualified to provide the required services.”
Off. of State Pub. Def. v. Fagenstrom, 439 P.3d 1285 (Mont. 2019). · cites it 10× “Section 47-1-104(1), MCA. See also §§ 46-8-101(2), -104(1), MCA (referencing Title 47, MCA).”
State v. Noli (Mont. 2020). · cites it 2× “Noli adds that she contemporaneously submitted a financial application to the Office ofthe State Public Defender.”
Lindquist v. 13th Jud. Dist. (Mont. 2022). · cites it 2× “OPD asserts further that the District Court exceeded its authority when it held OPD in contempt for disobeying an order with which OPD could not comply.”
Ramirez v. Lt. Valdez (Mont. 2022). · cites it 2× “" Rarnirez includes copies of the October 22, 2021 Yellowstone County District Court's Order Appointing Office of State Public Defender as well as the October 21, 2021 Minute Entries.”
Matter of J.H. J.H. & T.D.H., 2015 MT 244 (Mont. 2015). “, ¶¶ 28-31; §§ 47-1-104(4)(b)(i), 41-3-425(2), MCA. Discussions between an attorney and the child are confidential and protected by the attorney-client privilege.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(1): 1 case
Off. of State Pub. Def. v. Fagenstrom, 439 P.3d 1285 (Mont. 2019). “Section 47-1-104(1), MCA. See also §§ 46-8-101(2), -104(1), MCA (referencing Title 47, MCA).”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(3): 4 cases
State v. Zlahn, 2014 MT 224 (Mont. 2014). “Section 47-1-104(3), MCA, provides: “When a court orders the office [of the public defender] or the office of appellate defender to assign counsel, the appropriate office shall immediately assign a public defender qualified to provide the required services.”
Lance v. State, 2018 MT 23N (Mont. 2018). “Section 47-1-104(3), MCA, states, “When a court orders the assignment of a public defender, the appropriate office shall immediately assign a public defender qualified to provide the required services.”
Lindquist v. 13th Jud. Dist. (Mont. 2022). “OPD asserts further that the District Court exceeded its authority when it held OPD in contempt for disobeying an order with which OPD could not comply.”
Ramirez v. Lt. Valdez (Mont. 2022). “" Rarnirez includes copies of the October 22, 2021 Yellowstone County District Court's Order Appointing Office of State Public Defender as well as the October 21, 2021 Minute Entries.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(4): 1 case
Off. of State Pub. Def. v. Fagenstrom, 439 P.3d 1285 (Mont. 2019). “Section 47-1-104(1), MCA. See also §§ 46-8-101(2), -104(1), MCA (referencing Title 47, MCA).”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(4)(a): 1 case
Off. of State Pub. Def. v. Fagenstrom, 439 P.3d 1285 (Mont. 2019). “Section 47-1-104(1), MCA. See also §§ 46-8-101(2), -104(1), MCA (referencing Title 47, MCA).”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(4)(a)(i): 1 case
Off. of State Pub. Def. v. Fagenstrom, 439 P.3d 1285 (Mont. 2019). “Section 47-1-104(1), MCA. See also §§ 46-8-101(2), -104(1), MCA (referencing Title 47, MCA).”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(4)(a)(v): 1 case
Off. of the State Pub. Def. v. Montana Eighteenth Jud. Dist. Court, 2011 MT 97 (Mont. 2011). “¶4 Section 47-1-104(4)(a)(v), MCA, upon which the District Court has relied in part for its position, allows a district court to order OPD to assign counsel to a petitioner in a proceeding for postconviction relief “as provided in 46-21-201.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(4)(a)(vi): 1 case
Christopher Kenton Dyer v. Mahoney, 2008 MT 117 (Mont. 2008). “Section 47-1-104(4)(a)(vi), MCA. In such proceedings, appointment of OSPD is optional but is not mandated, as is the case for those proceedings outlined in ¶ 3.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(4)(b)(i): 1 case
Matter of J.H. J.H. & T.D.H., 2015 MT 244 (Mont. 2015). “, ¶¶ 28-31; §§ 47-1-104(4)(b)(i), 41-3-425(2), MCA. Discussions between an attorney and the child are confidential and protected by the attorney-client privilege.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(4)(b)(vii): 1 case
In Re the Guardianship & Conservatory of A.M.M., 2015 MT 250 (Mont. 2015). “” Section 47-1-104(4)(b)(vii), MCA. Thus, while it seems unusual for the public defender to be involved in a case like this, the Court correctly concludes that the District Court was authorized to appoint the public defender to represent A.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(4)(c): 1 case
State v. Noli (Mont. 2020). “Noli adds that she contemporaneously submitted a financial application to the Office ofthe State Public Defender.”
Mont. Code Ann. § 47-1-104(a)(v): 1 case
Christopher Kenton Dyer v. Mahoney, 2008 MT 117 (Mont. 2008). “Section 47-1-104(4)(a)(vi), MCA. In such proceedings, appointment of OSPD is optional but is not mandated, as is the case for those proceedings outlined in ¶ 3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.