Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 53-30-401 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 53. SOCIAL SERVICES AND INSTITUTIONS

CHAPTER 30. CORRECTIONS

Part 4. Boot Camp Incarceration Program (Repealed)

Repealed

53-30-401. Repealed. Sec. 24, Ch. 384, L. 2017.

History: En. Sec. 1, Ch. 463, L. 1993; amd. Sec. 516, Ch. 546, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 8, Ch. 505, L. 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1998–2014 · leading case: Campbell v. Mahoney, 2001 MT 146 (Mont. 2001).
Campbell v. Mahoney, 2001 MT 146 (Mont. 2001). · cites it 2× “See §§ 53-30-401 to -403, MCA (1993). It uses physical activity, military style discipline and intensive counseling to "correct criminal and other maladaptive thought processes and behavior patterns and to instill self-discipline and self-motivation.”
State v. Woods, 2005 MT 186 (Mont. 2005). “” Section 53-30-403(3)(b), MCA. Participation in boot camp is voluntary, and inmates who successfully complete the program are eligible to have their sentences reduced or converted to probation.”
Gilbert v. State, 2002 MT 258 (Mont. 2002). “Gilbert indicates that “[t]he only exception to a court retaining jurisdiction, under Montana law, is with regards to a sentencing court retaining jurisdiction for the boot camp incarceration program pursuant to § 53-30-401, et seq.”
State v. Johnston, 2014 MT 17N (Mont. 2014). · cites it 2× “In 1999, Johnston’s sentence was reduced by the court to a twenty-year suspended sentence, pursuant to § 53-30-401, MCA (1995). Johnston served 1160 days between his sentence commencement and his discharge to probation on September 8, 1999.”
State v. Cook, 292 Mont. 9 (Mont. 1998). · cites it 3× “It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant be considered for screening and placement in the Boot Camp Program pursuant to Section 53-30-401, MCA, et seq. On February 20, 1998, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.