61-9-422. Evidence admissible without presumption of negligence. Evidence of compliance or failure to comply with 61-9-420 is admissible in any civil action for personal injury or property damage resulting from the use or operation of a motor vehicle, but failure to comply with 61-9-420 does not alone constitute negligence.
Montana Code Annotated
Mont. Code Ann. § 61-9-422 (2026)
Evidence Admissible Without Presumption Of Negligence
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MT-LEGleg.mt.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TITLE 61. MOTOR VEHICLES
CHAPTER 9. VEHICLE EQUIPMENT
Part 4. Miscellaneous Regulations
Evidence Admissible Without Presumption Of Negligence
History: En. Sec. 4, Ch. 177, L. 1983.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2025 · leading case: Madaris v. State of Oregon High. Div., 723 P.2d 1054 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).
Madaris v. State of Oregon High. Div., 723 P.2d 1054 (Or. Ct. App. 1986). “4 See Mont Code Ann § 61-9-422; ND Cent Code § 39-21-41.”
State v. K. Mullendore, 2025 MT 282 (Mont. 2025). “In that same Chapter, § 61-9-422, MCA, deals specifically with the admissibility of evidence related to the child safety restraint statute, § 61-9-420, MCA, and explains that failure to comply with the child safety restraint statute “does not alone constitute negligence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.