Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 87-3-102 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 87. FISH AND WILDLIFE

CHAPTER 3. RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATIONS

Part 1. General Provisions

Repealed

87-3-102. Repealed. Sec. 120, Ch. 258, L. 2011.

History: En. Sec. 15, Ch. 238, L. 1921; re-en. Sec. 3696, R.C.M. 1921; amd. Sec. 7, Ch. 77, L. 1923; amd. Sec. 16, Ch. 192, L. 1925; amd. Sec. 13, Ch. 59, L. 1927; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 152, L. 1931; re-en. Sec. 3696, R.C.M. 1935; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 160, L. 1941; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 158, L. 1955; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 40, L. 1961; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 134, L. 1969; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 162, L. 1973; amd. Sec. 13, Ch. 417, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 26-307(1); amd. Sec. 5, Ch. 277, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 4, Ch. 263, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 275, L. 2001; amd. Sec. 6, Ch. 415, L. 2007.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1988–2016 · leading case: State v. Huebner, 827 P.2d 1260 (Mont. 1992).
State v. Huebner, 827 P.2d 1260 (Mont. 1992). · cites it 53× “Corey Huebner was convicted by a jury in the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, Madison County, of the misdemeanor charge of wasting game in violation of § 87-3-102, MCA (1989). He appeals. We affirm.”
State v. Romero, 926 P.2d 717 (Mont. 1996). · cites it 8× “In August of 1993, the Department of Fish, Wildlife & Parks charged Romero with the following five misdemeanor fish and game violations: hunting elk while privileges were suspended in violation of § 87-1-102(2)(f), MCA; hunting bear while privileges were suspended in violation…”
State v. Sullivan, 927 P.2d 1033 (Mont. 1996). · cites it 4× “In Huebner, the defendant was convicted of wasting game in violation of § 87-3-102, MCA (1989). On appeal, Huebner challenged, for the first time, the legal sufficiency of the jury instructions.”
City of Kalispell v. Omyer Athy, 2016 MT 63 (Mont. 2016). · cites it 2× “¶15 In Huebner , we concluded that § 87-3-102, MCA, prohibiting someone from killing a game animal and abandoning the meat, or removing only the parts suitable for trophy mounting, was an absolute liability statute based upon the State’s responsibility for protecting public…”
State v. Ruiz, 764 P.2d 89 (Idaho Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “010 ; Mont. Code Ann. § 87-3-102 ; Wyo. Stat. § 23-3-303.”
State v. Wilmer, 2011 MT 78 (Mont. 2011). · cites it 6× “¶15 Section 87-3-102(3), MCA, states: (3) A person responsible for the death of any game animal .”
City of Kalispell v. Omyer Athy, 2016 MT 63 (Mont. 2016). · cites it 2× “¶15 In Huebner, we concluded that § 87-3-102, MCA, prohibiting someone from killing a game animal and abandoning the meat, or removing only the parts suitable for trophy mounting, was an absolute liability statute based upon the State’s responsibility for protecting public…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 87-3-102(3): 1 case
State v. Wilmer, 2011 MT 78 (Mont. 2011). “¶15 Section 87-3-102(3), MCA, states: (3) A person responsible for the death of any game animal .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.