Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 87-3-103 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 87. FISH AND WILDLIFE

CHAPTER 3. RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATIONS

Part 1. General Provisions

Repealed

87-3-103. Repealed. Sec. 120, Ch. 258, L. 2011.

History: En. Sec. 15, Ch. 238, L. 1921; re-en. Sec. 3696, R.C.M. 1921; amd. Sec. 7, Ch. 77, L. 1923; amd. Sec. 16, Ch. 192, L. 1925; amd. Sec. 13, Ch. 59, L. 1927; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 152, L. 1931; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 160, L. 1941; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 158, L. 1955; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 40, L. 1961; amd. Sec. 3, Ch. 134, L. 1969; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 162, L. 1973; amd. Sec. 13, Ch. 417, L. 1977; R.C.M. 1947, 26-307(2); amd. Sec. 6, Ch. 277, L. 1991.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1995–2008 · leading case: State v. Bullock, 901 P.2d 61 (Mont. 1995).
State v. Bullock, 901 P.2d 61 (Mont. 1995). · cites it 4× “The defendants, Eddie Peterson and Bill Bullock, were charged in Jefferson County Justice Court with unlawfully killing a game animal in violation of § 87-3-103, MCA, and possession of an unlawfully killed animal in violation of § 87-3-112, MCA.”
State v. Cotterell, 2008 MT 409, 198 P.3d 254. · cites it 2× “¶18 As a result of Anderson’s investigation, Cotterell was charged by Information with eight counts of hunting violations, including three misdemeanor counts of killing more than the legal limit of game animals in violation of § 87-3-103, MCA (2003); one misdemeanor count of…”
State v. Hubbel, 951 P.2d 971 (Mont. 1997). “In that case, the defendant had been charged with unlawfully killing and possessing a game animal in violation of §§ 87-3-103 and 112, MCA. Bullock, 901 P.”
State v. Hubbel, 951 P.2d 971 (Mont. 1998). “In that case, the defendant had been charged with unlawfully killing and possessing a game animal in violation of §§ 87-3-103 and 112, MCA. Bullock, 901 P.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.