Montana Code Annotated

Mont. Code Ann. § 87-3-118 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MT-LEGleg.mt.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

TITLE 87. FISH AND WILDLIFE

CHAPTER 3. RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATIONS

Part 1. General Provisions

Repealed

87-3-118. Repealed. Sec. 120, Ch. 258, L. 2011.

History: En. Sec. 2, Ch. 329, L. 1991; amd. Sec. 30, Ch. 417, L. 1995; amd. Sec. 9, Ch. 502, L. 1999; amd. Sec. 6, Ch. 59, L. 2005.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2023 · leading case: State v. Norman, 244 P.3d 737 (Mont. 2010).
State v. Norman, 244 P.3d 737 (Mont. 2010). · cites it 46× “¶ 5 The State filed a three-count Information on January 2, 2008, charging Norman with violations of § 87-3-111, MCA (2005), and § 87-3-118, MCA (2003), [1] as follows: *740 Count 1: Unlawful possession of game animals, a felony, in violation of § 87-3-111(1), MCA (2005).”
State v. Brogan, 900 P.2d 284 (Mont. 1995). · cites it 28× “Brogan (Brogan) appeals from the judgment and sentence entered by the Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County, following a jury verdict convicting him of the felony offense of possession of unlawfully taken wildlife in violation of § 87-3-118(2), MCA. We affirm. We restate…”
State v. Gatts, 928 P.2d 114 (Mont. 1996). · cites it 14× “Under § 87-3-118, MCA, it is a felony offense to purposely or knowingly sell unlawfully taken wildlife or to purposely or knowingly possess unlawfully taken wildlife having a value of more than $1,000.”
State v. Cotterell, 198 P.3d 254 (Mont. 2008). · cites it 2× “ssion of an unlawfully killed game animal in violation of § 87-3-112, MCA (2003); one misdemeanor count of using two-way communication devices while hunting in violation of § 87-1-125, MCA (2003); one misdemeanor count ofhunting without landowner permission in violation of §…”
In Re Game Farm License No. 319 of Brogan, 942 P.2d 100 (Mont. 1997). · cites it 2× “In November 1993, pursuant to § 87-4-423, MCA, and § 87-4-427, MCA, the Department commenced administrative proceedings to revoke Brogan’s license based on his 1989 convictions, a 1993 conviction for possession of unlawfully taken wildlife in violation of § 87-3-118(2), MCA…”
K. Franks v. State, 2023 MT 65N (Mont. 2023). “On July 11, 2005, an Information was filed charging Frank with a single count of Felony Possession of Wildlife, in violation of §§ 87-3-118 and 87-1-115, MCA (2003). ¶4 On July 11, 2005, a plea agreement was filed with the District Court in which Frank agreed to plead guilty to…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 87-3-118(2): 3 cases
State v. Norman, 244 P.3d 737 (Mont. 2010). “¶ 5 The State filed a three-count Information on January 2, 2008, charging Norman with violations of § 87-3-111, MCA (2005), and § 87-3-118, MCA (2003), [1] as follows: *740 Count 1: Unlawful possession of game animals, a felony, in violation of § 87-3-111(1), MCA (2005).”
State v. Brogan, 900 P.2d 284 (Mont. 1995). “Brogan (Brogan) appeals from the judgment and sentence entered by the Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County, following a jury verdict convicting him of the felony offense of possession of unlawfully taken wildlife in violation of § 87-3-118(2), MCA. We affirm. We restate…”
In Re Game Farm License No. 319 of Brogan, 942 P.2d 100 (Mont. 1997). “In November 1993, pursuant to § 87-4-423, MCA, and § 87-4-427, MCA, the Department commenced administrative proceedings to revoke Brogan’s license based on his 1989 convictions, a 1993 conviction for possession of unlawfully taken wildlife in violation of § 87-3-118(2), MCA…”
Mont. Code Ann. § 87-3-118(4): 1 case
State v. Norman, 244 P.3d 737 (Mont. 2010). “¶ 5 The State filed a three-count Information on January 2, 2008, charging Norman with violations of § 87-3-111, MCA (2005), and § 87-3-118, MCA (2003), [1] as follows: *740 Count 1: Unlawful possession of game animals, a felony, in violation of § 87-3-111(1), MCA (2005).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.