Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 13
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-102 (2026)

Transferred to section 43-1402

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

13-102.

Transferred to section 43-1402.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1963–1988 · leading case: Shoecraft v. Catholic Soc. Servs. Bureau, Inc., 385 N.W.2d 448 (Neb. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Shoecraft v. Catholic Soc. Servs. Bureau, Inc., 385 N.W.2d 448 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 4× “And Neb.Rev.Stat. § 13-102 (Reissue 1983) provides that the father of a child whose paternity is established either by judicial proceedings or by acknowledgment shall be liable for its support to the same extent and in the same manner as the father of a child born in lawful…”
Riederer v. Siciunas, 228 N.W.2d 283 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 8× “The plaintiff relies on section 13-102, R. R. S. 1943, as expressly providing statutory authority for the granting of her application.”
State v. Reuter, 343 N.W.2d 907 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-102 (Reissue 1977). The second argument defendant makes concerning the sufficiency of the evidence is that it does not show he was able to support his children on March 1, 1983, as was charged by the information, and that *328 absent some showing he was…”
Cohee v. Cohee, 317 N.W.2d 381 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 2× “2d 100 (1979)); no preference is given to either parent based on sex (§ 42-364(2)); a mother as well as a father is liable for child support ( Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-102 (Reissue 1977)); and each parent has an equal and joint right to custody of the children, with custody being…”
Doak v. Milbauer, 343 N.W.2d 751 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 13-102 (Reissue 1977) makes one whose paternity is established by court proceeding or by acknowledgment liable for the support of the child to the same extent and in the same manner as the father of a child bom in lawful wedlock.”
Lancaster v. Brenneis, 417 N.W.2d 767 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “Consequently, concerning questions about custody and visitation of a child as well as child support in filiation proceedings, the Supreme Court’s review of a trial court’s judgment is de novo on the record to determine whether there has been an abuse of discretion by the trial…”
State ex rel. Stobel v. Stanek, 125 N.W.2d 107 (Neb. 1963). · cites it 2× “The liability of the parents of a child born out of wed *101 lock is fixed by section 13-102, R. R. S. 1943. It provides that such liability of the father to support the child shah be the same as that of the father of a child born in lawful wedlock.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.