Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 15
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 15-1201 (2026)

Appeals; exception

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person or persons, jointly or severally aggrieved by any final administrative or judicial order or decision of the board of zoning appeals, the board of equalization, the city council, or any officer, department, or board of a city of the primary class, shall, except as provided for claims in sections 15-840 to 15-842.01, appeal from such order or decision to the district court in the manner provided in sections 15-1201 to 15-1205.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1978–2016 · leading case: RGR Co. v. Lincoln Comm'n on Human Rights, 873 N.W.2d 881 (Neb. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
RGR Co. v. Lincoln Comm'n on Human Rights, 873 N.W.2d 881 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 15× “An appeal of a case heard in district court under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 15-1201 et seq. (Reissue 2012) to the appellate court is to be reviewed as in equity.”
Copple v. City of Lincoln, 315 N.W.2d 628 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 5× “The District Court, after a hearing on the merits of the plaintiffs petition, found that the plaintiff was not a person aggrieved within the meaning of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 15-1201 (Reissue 1977); that he did not have standing to sue; and that even if he had legal standing, he had…”
Moulton v. Bd. of Zoning App., Lincoln, 555 N.W.2d 39 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 5× “Moulton appealed the denial of his June 1, 1993, application to the Lancaster County District Court pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat. § 15-1201 (Reissue 1991), which provides that a person aggrieved by a decision of the Board may appeal to the district court.”
Jackson v. Bd. of Equalization, 630 N.W.2d 680 (Neb. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 3× “The district court ruled that the Landowners’ petition in appeal was governed by Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 15-1201 through 15-1205 (Reissue 1997).”
Cather & Sons Constr., Inc. v. City of Lincoln, 264 N.W.2d 413 (Neb. 1978). · cites it 12× “Cather then filed a petition on appeal in the District Court for Lancaster County pursuant to sections 15-1201 to 15-1205, R.R.S. 1943.”
Whitehead Oil Co. v. City of Lincoln, 515 N.W.2d 390 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 5× “SCOPE OF REVIEW Whitehead Oil’s appeal to the district court was taken pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 15-1201 (Reissue 1991) as an appeal from a final decision or order of the city council of a city of the primary class.”
City of Lincoln v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 626 N.W.2d 518 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 2× “Kabredlo’s did not appeal the city council’s decision to the district court pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 15-1201 (Reissue 1997).”
Bauers v. City of Lincoln, 514 N.W.2d 625 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 4× “Johnson contended that from October 1989 through December 1990, the City deducted a total of $15,157 from his pension. Because Johnson did not properly raise the validity of the deductions for workers’ compensation benefits in his claim to the City, that issue was not before the…”
Rauscher v. City of Lincoln, 691 N.W.2d 844 (Neb. 2005). “claimant, after the disallowance in whole or in part of any such claim, may appeal therefrom to the district court of the county in which the city is situated in accordance with the procedures set forth in sections 15-1201 to 15-1205.” Pursuant to Neb.”
Andrews v. City of Lincoln, 401 N.W.2d 467 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 15-1201 to 15-1205 (Reissue 1983) express the statutory provisions for an appeal to and hearing in the district court.”
Howard v. City of Lincoln, 497 N.W.2d 53 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “Furthermore, Howard received a full hearing when he brought this action for damages. In its order, the district court specifically found that the assessment was not a penalty and was intended only to recoup the costs of cutting the weeds.”
Bennett v. Bd. of Equalization, 515 N.W.2d 776 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 15-1201 etseq. (Reissue 1991), the appellants, 24 couples and individuals who owned property within the paving district, appealed their assessments to the district court for Lancaster County.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.