(1) The Nebraska State Fair Board, formerly known as the State
Board of Agriculture, shall hold an annual meeting for the purpose of deliberating
and consulting as to the wants, prospects, and conditions of the agricultural,
horticultural, industrial, mechanical, and other interests throughout the
state, as well as those interests in the encouragement and perpetuation of
the arts, skilled crafts, and sciences.
(2) The Nebraska State Fair Board may provide in its constitution
and bylaws for the qualification and participation of delegates at the annual
meeting from such associations incorporated under the laws of the state for
purposes of promoting and furthering the interests of participants in agricultural,
horticultural, industrial, mechanical, or other pursuits or for the encouragement
and perpetuation of the arts, skilled crafts, and sciences, and from such
associations as provide for the training, encouragement, and competition of
the youth of Nebraska in such endeavors. The annual meeting shall be held
in every odd-numbered year at the capital of the state and in every even-numbered
year at such location as the board determines. The chairperson of the board
shall also have the power to call meetings of the board whenever he or she
may deem it expedient. All meetings of the board shall be conducted in accordance
with the Open Meetings Act.
(3) The Nebraska State Fair shall be under the direction and
supervision of the Nebraska State Fair Board. The board may, at its discretion,
hold or dispense with the holding of the fair, in any year.
(4)(a) It is the intent of the Legislature that no later than 2010 the Nebraska
State Fair be permanently located within the city of Grand Island upon the
site and tract of land owned by the Hall County Livestock Improvement Association
and known as Fonner Park and,
as available and necessary, upon other parcels of land adjacent to Fonner
Park. The Nebraska State Fair Board shall cooperate and coordinate
with the Hall County Livestock Improvement Association, the city of Grand
Island, and other appropriate entities to provide for and carry out any plan
of improvements to such location, including the
construction of buildings and other capital facilities, the relocation of existing improvements, and
other enhancements, necessary to develop the site as a location suitable for
conducting the Nebraska State Fair. Such cooperation and coordination may
include financial participation in the costs of site development, new construction, and other capital improvements
upon such location and includes
the execution of any agreement for site governance, revenue sharing, and facility
utilization between and among the Nebraska State Fair Board, the Hall County
Livestock Improvement Association, and other appropriate entities.
(b) The Nebraska State Fair Board, the Department of Administrative
Services, and the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska shall cooperate
with each other and with other appropriate entities to provide for and carry
out the plan to relocate the Nebraska State Fair and transfer the Nebraska
State Fairgrounds in Lancaster County to the Board of Regents, including activities
by the Board of Regents to obtain due diligence surveys, reports, and site
assessments at the Nebraska State Fairgrounds in Lancaster County and by the
Nebraska State Fair Board in connection with providing marketable title to
the same in a form acceptable to the Board of Regents.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
53
cases (
10 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case:
State v. Blake, 310 Neb. 769 (Neb. 2022).
State v. Blake, 310 Neb. 769 (Neb. 2022).
· cites it 17× “The State relies on our appellate rule, § 2-101, for “Docketing the case.” Subsection (A) of § 2-101 concerns perfecting the appeal and focuses on the timely filing of the notice of appeal and docket fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis and the accompanying poverty…”
State v. Parnell, 883 N.W.2d 652 (Neb. 2016).
· cites it 2× “62 See § 2-101(B)(5)(b). - 580 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 294 Nebraska R eports STATE v.”
Yant v. City of Grand Island, 784 N.W.2d 101 (Neb. 2010).
· cites it 8× “*105 LB 1116 was passed and is now codified at § 2-101 (Supp.2009). Section 2-101(4)(a) states: It is the intent of the Legislature that no later than 2010 the Nebraska State Fair be permanently located within the city of Grand Island upon the site and tract of land owned by the…”
In re Interest of Becka P., 27 Neb. Ct. App. 489 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
“§ 2-101(C) (rev. 2014), once a notice of appeal is filed, all other parties become appellees and can file a cross-appeal.”
In re Interest of Steven S., 27 Neb. Ct. App. 831 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
· cites it 3× “§ 2-101(C) (rev. 2015), once a notice of appeal is filed, all other parties become appellees and can file a cross-appeal.”
State v. Guzman, 305 Neb. 376 (Neb. 2020).
“§ 2-101(E) (rev. 2015). 16 See, § 29-2315.”
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 835 N.W.2d 44 (Neb. 2013).
“When the Legislature fixes the time for taking an appeal, the courts have no power to extend the time directly or indirectly.”
Pinnacle Enters. v. City of Papillion, 836 N.W.2d 588 (Neb. 2013).
“§ 2-101(E) (rev. 2010). Nebraska Advance Sheets 332 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS appraisers’ award, the condemnee was always denominated as “the plaintiff” and the condemnor was always denominated as “the defendant.”
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Transit Auth. of Omaha, 308 Neb. 916 (Neb. 2021).
“The cross-appeal need only be asserted in the appellee’s brief as provided by § 2-109(D)(4).” A cross-appeal is properly designated by noting it on the cover of the appellee brief and setting it forth in a separate division of the brief 9; however, the decisive particulars gov-…”
Mumin v. Frakes, 298 Neb. 381 (Neb. 2017).
· cites it 2× “51 Therefore, we conclude the district court erred in denying Mumin’s application to proceed IFP 48 Id. at 709, 687 N.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(3) — 1 case
Yant v. City of Grand Island, 784 N.W.2d 101 (Neb. 2010).
“*105 LB 1116 was passed and is now codified at § 2-101 (Supp.2009). Section 2-101(4)(a) states: It is the intent of the Legislature that no later than 2010 the Nebraska State Fair be permanently located within the city of Grand Island upon the site and tract of land owned by the…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(4)(a) — 1 case
Yant v. City of Grand Island, 784 N.W.2d 101 (Neb. 2010).
“*105 LB 1116 was passed and is now codified at § 2-101 (Supp.2009). Section 2-101(4)(a) states: It is the intent of the Legislature that no later than 2010 the Nebraska State Fair be permanently located within the city of Grand Island upon the site and tract of land owned by the…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(A) — 5 cases
State v. Blake, 310 Neb. 769 (Neb. 2022).
“The State relies on our appellate rule, § 2-101, for “Docketing the case.” Subsection (A) of § 2-101 concerns perfecting the appeal and focuses on the timely filing of the notice of appeal and docket fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis and the accompanying poverty…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(A)(1) — 2 cases
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(B) — 6 cases
State v. Blake, 310 Neb. 769 (Neb. 2022).
“The State relies on our appellate rule, § 2-101, for “Docketing the case.” Subsection (A) of § 2-101 concerns perfecting the appeal and focuses on the timely filing of the notice of appeal and docket fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis and the accompanying poverty…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(B)(1)(a) — 2 cases
State v. Blake, 310 Neb. 769 (Neb. 2022).
“The State relies on our appellate rule, § 2-101, for “Docketing the case.” Subsection (A) of § 2-101 concerns perfecting the appeal and focuses on the timely filing of the notice of appeal and docket fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis and the accompanying poverty…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(B)(4) — 5 cases
State v. Blake, 310 Neb. 769 (Neb. 2022).
“The State relies on our appellate rule, § 2-101, for “Docketing the case.” Subsection (A) of § 2-101 concerns perfecting the appeal and focuses on the timely filing of the notice of appeal and docket fee or application to proceed in forma pauperis and the accompanying poverty…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(B)(5)(b) — 2 cases
State v. Parnell, 883 N.W.2d 652 (Neb. 2016).
“62 See § 2-101(B)(5)(b). - 580 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 294 Nebraska R eports STATE v.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(C) — 19 cases
In re Interest of Becka P., 27 Neb. Ct. App. 489 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
“§ 2-101(C) (rev. 2014), once a notice of appeal is filed, all other parties become appellees and can file a cross-appeal.”
In re Interest of Steven S., 27 Neb. Ct. App. 831 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
“§ 2-101(C) (rev. 2015), once a notice of appeal is filed, all other parties become appellees and can file a cross-appeal.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(E) — 11 cases
State v. Guzman, 305 Neb. 376 (Neb. 2020).
“§ 2-101(E) (rev. 2015). 16 See, § 29-2315.”
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 835 N.W.2d 44 (Neb. 2013).
“When the Legislature fixes the time for taking an appeal, the courts have no power to extend the time directly or indirectly.”
Pinnacle Enters. v. City of Papillion, 836 N.W.2d 588 (Neb. 2013).
“§ 2-101(E) (rev. 2010). Nebraska Advance Sheets 332 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS appraisers’ award, the condemnee was always denominated as “the plaintiff” and the condemnor was always denominated as “the defendant.”
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Transit Auth. of Omaha, 308 Neb. 916 (Neb. 2021).
“The cross-appeal need only be asserted in the appellee’s brief as provided by § 2-109(D)(4).” A cross-appeal is properly designated by noting it on the cover of the appellee brief and setting it forth in a separate division of the brief 9; however, the decisive particulars gov-…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(F)(1) — 5 cases
State v. Parnell, 883 N.W.2d 652 (Neb. 2016).
“62 See § 2-101(B)(5)(b). - 580 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 294 Nebraska R eports STATE v.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(F)(2) — 1 case
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(F)(6) — 1 case
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(G)(1)(b) — 1 case
Mumin v. Frakes, 298 Neb. 381 (Neb. 2017).
“51 Therefore, we conclude the district court erred in denying Mumin’s application to proceed IFP 48 Id. at 709, 687 N.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-101(G)(1)(c) — 2 cases
Mumin v. Frakes, 298 Neb. 381 (Neb. 2017).
“51 Therefore, we conclude the district court erred in denying Mumin’s application to proceed IFP 48 Id. at 709, 687 N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.