Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 2
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105 (2026)

State Fair Foundation; authorized

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It is the intent of the Legislature that the Nebraska State Fair Board establish the State Fair Foundation as a nonprofit foundation operated exclusively as a corporation for charitable purposes as contemplated by sections 170(c)(2) and 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code as defined in section 49-801.01, and organized and operated for the benefit of and to carry out the purposes of the board. The foundation may solicit, receive, hold, invest, and contribute funds and property for the use and benefit of the board in a manner consistent with the public good and primarily for capital expenditure and other needs not funded by other means.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 64 cases (19 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: State v. Malone, 308 Neb. 929 (Neb. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Malone, 308 Neb. 929 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 17× “§ 2-105 (rev. 2018). 11 After perfecting his first appeal, Malone filed an applica- tion for the Court of Appeals to “remand” for a § 2-105(B)(5) hearing to correct the bill of exceptions.”
In re Interest of Tyrone K., 887 N.W.2d 489 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “49 Likewise, nothing would preclude an appellant from filing a praecipe to prepare a bill of exceptions in each such court, with a copy delivered to the proper court reporting personnel.”
State v. Alarcon-Chavez, 893 N.W.2d 706 (Neb. 2017). “2010) states: Upon the request of the court or of any party, either through counsel or pro se, the court reporting personnel shall make or have made a verbatim record of anything and everything said or done by anyone in the course of trial or any other proceeding, including, but…”
Albrecht v. Fettig, 27 Neb. Ct. App. 371 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 2-105 (Reissue 2001). This matter involves a sale of cattle, which are movable at the time of identification in the parties' purchase agreement.”
Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech., 292 Neb. 148 (Neb. 2015). · cites it 2× “§ 2-105(B)(1)(b) (rev. 2010) place the burden on the appel- lant to file a praecipe identifying the matter to be contained in the bill of exceptions.”
State v. Epp, 773 N.W.2d 356 (Neb. 2009). “§ 2-105, which requires a certificate by the court reporter but does not specify that a seal is required.”
State v. Sierra, 305 Neb. 249 (Neb. 2020). “When recordation of parts of a trial is not made man- datory by the rules, the failure to request recordation cannot be said, ipso facto, to constitute negligence or inadequacy of counsel.”
Hynes v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 830 N.W.2d 499 (Neb. 2013). “…v. Cargill Meat Solutions, supra note 1; VanKirk v. Central Community College, supra note 1. 9 Neb. Ct. R. App. P. § 2-105(2)(B)(1)(b) (rev. 2010).”
State v. Barker, 420 N.W.2d 695 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 2-105(1) (Reissue 1985). To counter Barker's claim that the trial judge should have recused himself as a result of meeting with the victim's family, the State argues that "[s]ince the appellant has not shown that the sentencing judge was in any way influenced…”
Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co., 481 N.W.2d 422 (Neb. 1992). “§ 2-725 to become applicable to Murphy’s case, we must first determine whether Murphy’s agreement with Spelts-Schultz was a contract for the sale of goods governed by the Uniform Commercial Code.”
MBH, INC. v. John Otte Oil & Propane, Inc., 727 N.W.2d 238 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007). “§ 2-105 (Reissue 2001). If a transaction is not for the sale of goods, the provisions of the U.”
State v. Henderson, 289 Neb. 271 (Neb. 2014). “15 We cannot conclude from the record that the findings of the district court in the § 2-105(B)(5) hearing were so unsubstanti- ated that any purported errors were injurious to the integrity, reputation, or fairness of the judicial process as to justify reversal on appeal under…”
Show all 64 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(1) — 7 cases
State v. Barker, 420 N.W.2d 695 (Neb. 1988). “See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 2-105(1) (Reissue 1985). To counter Barker's claim that the trial judge should have recused himself as a result of meeting with the victim's family, the State argues that "[s]ince the appellant has not shown that the sentencing judge was in any way influenced…”
Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co., 481 N.W.2d 422 (Neb. 1992). “§ 2-725 to become applicable to Murphy’s case, we must first determine whether Murphy’s agreement with Spelts-Schultz was a contract for the sale of goods governed by the Uniform Commercial Code.”
State Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Wash. Int'l Ins. Co., 304 F. Supp. 3d 827 (D. Neb. 2018).
Laird v. Scribner Coop, Inc., 466 N.W.2d 798 (Neb. 1991).
Dugdale of Nebraska, Inc. v. First State Bank, 420 N.W.2d 273 (Neb. 1988).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(2) — 2 cases
O'Keefe Elevator Co. v. Second Avenue Props., Ltd., 343 N.W.2d 54 (Neb. 1984).
Hammond v. Streeter, 406 N.W.2d 633 (Neb. 1987).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(2)(B)(1)(b) — 1 case
Hynes v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 830 N.W.2d 499 (Neb. 2013). “…v. Cargill Meat Solutions, supra note 1; VanKirk v. Central Community College, supra note 1. 9 Neb. Ct. R. App. P. § 2-105(2)(B)(1)(b) (rev. 2010).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(5) — 1 case
State v. Kays (Neb. Ct. App. 2013).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(A) — 2 cases
State v. LeFever (Neb. Ct. App. 2024).
Silver v. Silver (Neb. Ct. App. 2018).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(A)(1) — 6 cases
Olander v. McPhillips, 28 Neb. Ct. App. 559 (Neb. Ct. App. 2020).
State v. LeFever (Neb. Ct. App. 2024).
State v. Taliaferro (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
Anderson v. Keller (Neb. Ct. App. 2020).
Van Ranken v. Van Ranken (Neb. Ct. App. 2021).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(A)(2) — 8 cases
State v. Alarcon-Chavez, 893 N.W.2d 706 (Neb. 2017). “2010) states: Upon the request of the court or of any party, either through counsel or pro se, the court reporting personnel shall make or have made a verbatim record of anything and everything said or done by anyone in the course of trial or any other proceeding, including, but…”
State v. Sierra, 305 Neb. 249 (Neb. 2020). “When recordation of parts of a trial is not made man- datory by the rules, the failure to request recordation cannot be said, ipso facto, to constitute negligence or inadequacy of counsel.”
State v. LeFever (Neb. Ct. App. 2024).
Silver v. Silver (Neb. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Estrada (Neb. Ct. App. 2025).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(A)(3) — 1 case
State v. LeFever (Neb. Ct. App. 2024).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(1)(a) — 3 cases
State v. Kunc (Neb. Ct. App. 2021).
State v. Gonzalez-Ramierz (Neb. Ct. App. 2020).
Larson v. Larson (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(1)(b) — 4 cases
Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech., 292 Neb. 148 (Neb. 2015). “§ 2-105(B)(1)(b) (rev. 2010) place the burden on the appel- lant to file a praecipe identifying the matter to be contained in the bill of exceptions.”
State on behalf of A'Layah S. v. D'Angelo S. (Neb. Ct. App. 2025).
Kirkelie v. Henry (Neb. Ct. App. 2017).
State v. Wiliams (Neb. Ct. App. 2021).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(13) — 1 case
In Re Interest of Tyler, 781 N.W.2d 922 (Neb. 2010).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(2) — 1 case
Coe v. Johnson (Neb. Ct. App. 2024).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(2)(a) — 6 cases
Parde v. Parde, 979 N.W.2d 788 (Neb. Ct. App. 2022).
Knight v. Damme (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
Larson v. Larson (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
Box v. Bimbo Bakeries USA (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
Willbrand on behalf of Willbrand-Santos v. Sotolongo (Neb. Ct. App. 2024).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(2)(b) — 2 cases
Young v. Miller (Neb. Ct. App. 2025).
Knight v. Damme (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(2)(e) — 1 case
In re Interest of Bosileo D., 321 Neb. 490 (Neb. 2026).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(2)(f) — 3 cases
Larson v. Larson (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
In re Interest of Bosileo D. (Neb. Ct. App. 2025).
In re Interest of Bosileo D., 321 Neb. 490 (Neb. 2026).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(3) — 1 case
State v. Hinds, 995 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(4) — 1 case
Credit Bureau Servs. v. Sundquist (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(4)(b) — 1 case
Box v. Bimbo Bakeries USA (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(4)(c) — 1 case
Box v. Bimbo Bakeries USA (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(5) — 7 cases
State v. Malone, 308 Neb. 929 (Neb. 2021). “§ 2-105 (rev. 2018). 11 After perfecting his first appeal, Malone filed an applica- tion for the Court of Appeals to “remand” for a § 2-105(B)(5) hearing to correct the bill of exceptions.”
State v. Henderson, 289 Neb. 271 (Neb. 2014). “15 We cannot conclude from the record that the findings of the district court in the § 2-105(B)(5) hearing were so unsubstanti- ated that any purported errors were injurious to the integrity, reputation, or fairness of the judicial process as to justify reversal on appeal under…”
State ex. rel. Malone v. Baldonado-Bellamy, 307 Neb. 549 (Neb. 2020).
State v. Kays (Neb. 2014).
In re Guardianship of Kyoko R. (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-105(B)(9) — 1 case
In re Guardianship of Kyoko R. (Neb. Ct. App. 2019).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.