Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 2
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-107 (2026)

State Fair Cash Fund; created; use; investment

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The State Fair Cash Fund is created. The Tax Commissioner may use the fund to defray the cost of implementing the check-off program under section 77-27,119.05. The Nebraska State Fair shall use the fund to carry out the public-private partnerships established to enhance the work of the Nebraska State Fair. Any money in the fund available for investment shall be invested by the state investment officer pursuant to the Nebraska Capital Expansion Act and the Nebraska State Funds Investment Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47 cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Last Pass Aviation v. W. Co-op Co., 892 N.W.2d 108 (Neb. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Last Pass Aviation v. W. Co-op Co., 892 N.W.2d 108 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 3× “§ 2-107(A)(2) (rev. 2012) and Malolepszy v.”
Lenape Resources Corp. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 925 S.W.2d 565 (Tex. 1996). “§ 30-2-107; Neb.Rev.Stat. § 2-107; Nev.Rev.Stat. § 104.”
State v. Williams, 774 N.W.2d 384 (Neb. 2009). “Williams again appealed to the Court of Appeals, and, on January 20, 2009, the court summarily dismissed the appeal with the following minute entry: Appeal dismissed.”
In re Est. of Scaletta, 981 N.W.2d 568 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “§ 2-107(A)(1) (rev. 2022). We granted Carl Sr.”
Mortg. Exp., Inc. v. Tudor Ins. Co., 771 N.W.2d 137 (Neb. 2009). “§ 2-107, because the court's order failed to properly certify the case for appeal.”
State v. Schnell, 757 N.W.2d 732 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “§§ 2-107(B)(4) and (5) and 2-108(D). Despite this technical flaw, the issues raised by Schnell's filing are inherent in our consideration of the motion to dismiss the appeal.”
State v. Assad, 304 Neb. 979 (Neb. 2020). “It later granted the State’s motion for summary affirmance. The Court of Appeals’ disposition stated in full: Motion of appellee for summary affirmance sustained; judgment affirmed.”
Kaiser v. Allstate Indem. Co., 307 Neb. 562 (Neb. 2020). “§ 2-107(A)(2) (rev. 2017) because we could not find that the district court had entered a final, appealable order.”
In re Interest of Danaisha W., 287 Neb. 27 (Neb. 2013). “§ 2-107(B)(1) (rev. 2012), con- tending that there was no final, appealable order.”
E.D. v. Bellevue Pub. Sch. Dist., 909 N.W.2d 652 (Neb. 2018). “§ 2-107(A)(2) (rev. 2017), finding the ruling on the motion to dismiss was not a final, appealable order.”
Tyrrell v. Frakes, 309 Neb. 85 (Neb. 2021). “§ 2-107(B) (rev. 2017). - 90 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports TYRRELL v.”
Williams v. Williams, 975 N.W.2d 523 (Neb. 2022). “Katherine appealed to the Court of Appeals and claimed that the district court erred when it dismissed her amended complaint for grandparent visitation and when it overruled her amended motion to alter or amend which would have added Ted as a party.”
Show all 47 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-107(A)(1) — 4 cases
In re Est. of Scaletta, 981 N.W.2d 568 (Neb. 2022). “§ 2-107(A)(1) (rev. 2022). We granted Carl Sr.”
State v. Hausmann, 758 N.W.2d 54 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008).
Elbert v. Keating, O'Gara, 319 Neb. 390 (Neb. 2025).
In re Est. of Jeffres, 32 Neb. Ct. App. 628 (Neb. Ct. App. 2024).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-107(A)(2) — 21 cases
Last Pass Aviation v. W. Co-op Co., 892 N.W.2d 108 (Neb. 2017). “§ 2-107(A)(2) (rev. 2012) and Malolepszy v.”
State v. Williams, 774 N.W.2d 384 (Neb. 2009). “Williams again appealed to the Court of Appeals, and, on January 20, 2009, the court summarily dismissed the appeal with the following minute entry: Appeal dismissed.”
Kaiser v. Allstate Indem. Co., 307 Neb. 562 (Neb. 2020). “§ 2-107(A)(2) (rev. 2017) because we could not find that the district court had entered a final, appealable order.”
E.D. v. Bellevue Pub. Sch. Dist., 909 N.W.2d 652 (Neb. 2018). “§ 2-107(A)(2) (rev. 2017), finding the ruling on the motion to dismiss was not a final, appealable order.”
Williams v. Williams, 975 N.W.2d 523 (Neb. 2022). “Katherine appealed to the Court of Appeals and claimed that the district court erred when it dismissed her amended complaint for grandparent visitation and when it overruled her amended motion to alter or amend which would have added Ted as a party.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-107(A)(3) — 1 case
Frans v. Waldinger Corp., 306 Neb. 574 (Neb. 2020).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-107(B) — 2 cases
Tyrrell v. Frakes, 309 Neb. 85 (Neb. 2021). “§ 2-107(B) (rev. 2017). - 90 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports TYRRELL v.”
State v. Wells, 763 N.W.2d 380 (Neb. 2009).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-107(B)(1) — 8 cases
In re Interest of Danaisha W., 287 Neb. 27 (Neb. 2013). “§ 2-107(B)(1) (rev. 2012), con- tending that there was no final, appealable order.”
In re Masek Fam. Trust, 318 Neb. 268 (Neb. 2025).
State v. Jacob, 309 Neb. 401 (Neb. 2021).
In re Interest of Ricardo T., 999 N.W.2d 562 (Neb. 2024).
Bhuller v. Bhuller, 767 N.W.2d 813 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-107(B)(2) — 6 cases
State v. Assad, 304 Neb. 979 (Neb. 2020). “It later granted the State’s motion for summary affirmance. The Court of Appeals’ disposition stated in full: Motion of appellee for summary affirmance sustained; judgment affirmed.”
State v. Rejai, 320 Neb. 599 (Neb. 2026).
State v. Wells, 763 N.W.2d 380 (Neb. 2009).
State v. Anthony, 320 Neb. 757 (Neb. 2026).
State v. Foster (Neb. Ct. App. 2016).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-107(B)(4) — 2 cases
State v. Schnell, 757 N.W.2d 732 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “§§ 2-107(B)(4) and (5) and 2-108(D). Despite this technical flaw, the issues raised by Schnell's filing are inherent in our consideration of the motion to dismiss the appeal.”
State v. Jones, 320 Neb. 766 (Neb. 2026).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-107(B)(5) — 1 case
State v. Jones, 320 Neb. 766 (Neb. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.