Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 2
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111 (2026)

Annual report

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Nebraska State Fair Board shall, no later than November 1 of each year, provide an annual report to the Governor and the Legislature regarding the use of the Nebraska State Fair Support and Improvement Cash Fund. The report submitted to the Legislature shall be submitted electronically. The report shall include (1) a detailed listing of how the proceeds of the fund were expended in the prior fiscal year and (2) any distributions from the fund that remain unexpended and on deposit in Nebraska State Fair accounts.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 50 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case: Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 835 N.W.2d 44 (Neb. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 835 N.W.2d 44 (Neb. 2013). “Nebraska Advance Sheets 100 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS cross-appeal assigns, restated, that the court abused its discre­ tion in the first order, which found a material change of cir­ cumstances warranting modification of the decree as to child custody, visitation, and support, and…”
State v. Britt, 963 N.W.2d 533 (Neb. 2021). “BRITT must allege facts which, if proved, constitute a denial or violation of his or her rights under the U.S. or Nebraska Constitution, causing the judgment against the defendant to be void or voidable.”
State v. Shipler, 758 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 2-111(B)(1), this case was ordered submitted without oral argument.”
State v. Yos-chiguil, 772 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 2009). “02(1) is sufficient and that the advisement which was given to Yos-Chiguil substantially complied with those requirements.”
State v. Malone, 957 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 2021). “We find no evidence in the appellate record that Malone filed a motion to amend the bill of exceptions in the district court; his attempt to amend the bill of exceptions was therefore improper.”
State v. Raatz, 885 N.W.2d 38 (Neb. 2016). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a) (rev. 2014), the case was submitted without oral argument.”
Marcovitz v. Rogers, 752 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “Rogers, 267 Neb. 456 , 675 N.W.2d 132 (2004). [2] Marcovitz v.”
State v. Adam B., 948 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 2020). “3 ANALYSIS [1-4] Parents have a fundamental right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children 1 See Neb.”
State v. Simnick, 771 N.W.2d 196 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a), the cause is submitted for decision without oral argument.”
Nathan v. McDermott, 945 N.W.2d 92 (Neb. 2020). “They alleged that McDermott and Hoy breached several warranties and refused to indemnify the Nathans as the purchase agreement required. Further, they alleged that McDermott and Hoy breached a duty of good faith and fair dealing by making multiple misrepresentations, breaching…”
Brumbaugh v. Bendorf, 945 N.W.2d 116 (Neb. 2020). “BENDORF STANDARD OF REVIEW [1] A trial court’s decision awarding or denying attorney fees will be upheld absent an abuse of discretion. 5 [2] The decision of a trial court regarding taxing of costs is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
State v. Vela-Montes, 844 N.W.2d 286 (Neb. 2014). “” We did not determine how much time remained on the speedy trial clock.”
Show all 50 citing cases →
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(A): 2 cases
State v. Malone, 957 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 2021). “We find no evidence in the appellate record that Malone filed a motion to amend the bill of exceptions in the district court; his attempt to amend the bill of exceptions was therefore improper.”
Millennium Labs. v. Ward, 289 Neb. 718 (2014).
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(B): 1 case
Millennium Labs. v. Ward, 289 Neb. 718 (2014).
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(B)(1): 30 cases
State v. Shipler, 758 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 2-111(B)(1), this case was ordered submitted without oral argument.”
Marcovitz v. Rogers, 752 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “Rogers, 267 Neb. 456 , 675 N.W.2d 132 (2004). [2] Marcovitz v.”
State v. Adam B., 948 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 2020). “3 ANALYSIS [1-4] Parents have a fundamental right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, and control of their children 1 See Neb.”
Nathan v. McDermott, 945 N.W.2d 92 (Neb. 2020). “They alleged that McDermott and Hoy breached several warranties and refused to indemnify the Nathans as the purchase agreement required. Further, they alleged that McDermott and Hoy breached a duty of good faith and fair dealing by making multiple misrepresentations, breaching…”
Brumbaugh v. Bendorf, 945 N.W.2d 116 (Neb. 2020). “BENDORF STANDARD OF REVIEW [1] A trial court’s decision awarding or denying attorney fees will be upheld absent an abuse of discretion. 5 [2] The decision of a trial court regarding taxing of costs is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(B)(1)(a): 3 cases
State v. Britt, 963 N.W.2d 533 (Neb. 2021). “BRITT must allege facts which, if proved, constitute a denial or violation of his or her rights under the U.S. or Nebraska Constitution, causing the judgment against the defendant to be void or voidable.”
State v. Delgado, No. A-25-604 (Neb. Ct. App. Mar. 17, 2026).
Npimnee v. Shiffermiller, 36 N.W.3d 503 (Neb. 2026).
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(E)(4): 1 case
Jackson v. Rodriguez, 18 N.W.3d 408 (Neb. 2025).
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(E)(5)(a): 11 cases
State v. Yos-chiguil, 772 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 2009). “02(1) is sufficient and that the advisement which was given to Yos-Chiguil substantially complied with those requirements.”
State v. Raatz, 885 N.W.2d 38 (Neb. 2016). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a) (rev. 2014), the case was submitted without oral argument.”
State v. Simnick, 771 N.W.2d 196 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a), the cause is submitted for decision without oral argument.”
State v. Clark, 762 N.W.2d 64 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. White, 755 N.W.2d 604 (Neb. 2008).
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(E)(6): 2 cases
Jackson v. Rodriguez, 18 N.W.3d 408 (Neb. 2025).
In re Interest of Antonio J., 886 N.W.2d 522 (Neb. 2016).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.