Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 2
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111 (2026)

Annual report

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Nebraska State Fair Board shall, no later than November 1 of each year, provide an annual report to the Governor and the Legislature regarding the use of the Nebraska State Fair Support and Improvement Cash Fund. The report submitted to the Legislature shall be submitted electronically. The report shall include (1) a detailed listing of how the proceeds of the fund were expended in the prior fiscal year and (2) any distributions from the fund that remain unexpended and on deposit in Nebraska State Fair accounts.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 50 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case: Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 835 N.W.2d 44 (Neb. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 835 N.W.2d 44 (Neb. 2013). “Nebraska Advance Sheets 100 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS cross-appeal assigns, restated, that the court abused its discre­ tion in the first order, which found a material change of cir­ cumstances warranting modification of the decree as to child custody, visitation, and support, and…”
State v. Britt, 310 Neb. 69 (Neb. 2021). “Postconviction Principles [2,3] Postconviction relief is available to a prisoner in cus- tody under sentence who seeks to be released on the ground that there was a denial or infringement of his or her constitu- tional rights such that the judgment was void or voidable.”
State v. Shipler, 758 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 2-111(B)(1), this case was ordered submitted without oral argument.”
State v. Yos-chiguil, 772 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 2009). “02(1) is sufficient and that the advisement which was given to Yos-Chiguil substantially complied with those requirements.”
State v. Malone, 308 Neb. 929 (Neb. 2021). “22 [11] But to the extent our decision in Kays can be read to approve the underlying procedure used to amend the bill of exceptions in that case and in the case at issue, that aspect of the decision is overruled.”
State v. Raatz, 294 Neb. 852 (Neb. 2016). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a) (rev. 2014), the case was submitted without oral argument.”
Marcovitz v. Rogers, 752 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “Rogers, 267 Neb. 456 , 675 N.W.2d 132 (2004). [2] Marcovitz v.”
State on behalf of Tina K. v. Adam B., 307 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2020). “STANDARD OF REVIEW Child custody determinations are matters initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial court, and although reviewed de novo on the record, the trial court’s determination will nor- mally be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion. 3 ANALYSIS [1-4] Parents…”
State v. Simnick, 771 N.W.2d 196 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a), the cause is submitted for decision without oral argument.”
Nathan v. McDermott, 306 Neb. 216 (Neb. 2020). “§ 2-111(B)(1) (rev. 2017). - 223 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports NATHAN v.”
Brumbaugh v. Bendorf, 306 Neb. 250 (Neb. 2020). “§ 2-111(B)(1) (rev. 2017). - 254 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports BRUMBAUGH v.”
State v. Vela-Montes, 287 Neb. 679 (Neb. 2014). “” We did not determine how much time remained on the speedy trial clock.”
Show all 50 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(A) — 2 cases
State v. Malone, 308 Neb. 929 (Neb. 2021). “22 [11] But to the extent our decision in Kays can be read to approve the underlying procedure used to amend the bill of exceptions in that case and in the case at issue, that aspect of the decision is overruled.”
Millennium Labs. v. Ward (Neb. 2014).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(B) — 1 case
Millennium Labs. v. Ward (Neb. 2014).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(B)(1) — 30 cases
State v. Shipler, 758 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 2-111(B)(1), this case was ordered submitted without oral argument.”
Marcovitz v. Rogers, 752 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “Rogers, 267 Neb. 456 , 675 N.W.2d 132 (2004). [2] Marcovitz v.”
State on behalf of Tina K. v. Adam B., 307 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2020). “STANDARD OF REVIEW Child custody determinations are matters initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial court, and although reviewed de novo on the record, the trial court’s determination will nor- mally be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion. 3 ANALYSIS [1-4] Parents…”
Nathan v. McDermott, 306 Neb. 216 (Neb. 2020). “§ 2-111(B)(1) (rev. 2017). - 223 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports NATHAN v.”
Brumbaugh v. Bendorf, 306 Neb. 250 (Neb. 2020). “§ 2-111(B)(1) (rev. 2017). - 254 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports BRUMBAUGH v.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(B)(1)(a) — 3 cases
State v. Britt, 310 Neb. 69 (Neb. 2021). “Postconviction Principles [2,3] Postconviction relief is available to a prisoner in cus- tody under sentence who seeks to be released on the ground that there was a denial or infringement of his or her constitu- tional rights such that the judgment was void or voidable.”
Npimnee v. Shiffermiller, 321 Neb. 700 (Neb. 2026).
State v. Delgado (Neb. Ct. App. 2026).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(E)(4) — 1 case
Jackson v. Rodriguez, 318 Neb. 657 (Neb. 2025).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(E)(5)(a) — 11 cases
State v. Yos-chiguil, 772 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 2009). “02(1) is sufficient and that the advisement which was given to Yos-Chiguil substantially complied with those requirements.”
State v. Raatz, 294 Neb. 852 (Neb. 2016). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a) (rev. 2014), the case was submitted without oral argument.”
State v. Simnick, 771 N.W.2d 196 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a), the cause is submitted for decision without oral argument.”
State v. Clark, 762 N.W.2d 64 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. White, 755 N.W.2d 604 (Neb. 2008).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(E)(6) — 2 cases
Jackson v. Rodriguez, 318 Neb. 657 (Neb. 2025).
In re Interest of Antonio J., 886 N.W.2d 522 (Neb. 2016).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.