Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111 (2026)
Annual report
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The Nebraska State Fair Board shall, no later than November 1 of each year, provide an annual report to the Governor and the Legislature regarding the use of the Nebraska State Fair Support and Improvement Cash Fund. The report submitted to the Legislature shall be submitted electronically. The report shall include (1) a detailed listing of how the proceeds of the fund were expended in the prior fiscal year and (2) any distributions from the fund that remain unexpended and on deposit in Nebraska State Fair accounts.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 50
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case: Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 835 N.W.2d 44 (Neb. 2013).
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald, 835 N.W.2d 44 (Neb. 2013). “Nebraska Advance Sheets 100 286 NEBRASKA REPORTS cross-appeal assigns, restated, that the court abused its discre tion in the first order, which found a material change of cir cumstances warranting modification of the decree as to child custody, visitation, and support, and…”
State v. Britt, 963 N.W.2d 533 (Neb. 2021). “Postconviction Principles [2,3] Postconviction relief is available to a prisoner in cus- tody under sentence who seeks to be released on the ground that there was a denial or infringement of his or her constitu- tional rights such that the judgment was void or voidable.”
State v. Shipler, 758 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 2-111(B)(1), this case was ordered submitted without oral argument.”
State v. Yos-chiguil, 772 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 2009). “02(1) is sufficient and that the advisement which was given to Yos-Chiguil substantially complied with those requirements.”
State v. Malone, 957 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 2021). “22 [11] But to the extent our decision in Kays can be read to approve the underlying procedure used to amend the bill of exceptions in that case and in the case at issue, that aspect of the decision is overruled.”
State v. Raatz, 885 N.W.2d 38 (Neb. 2016). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a) (rev. 2014), the case was submitted without oral argument.”
Marcovitz v. Rogers, 752 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “Rogers, 267 Neb. 456 , 675 N.W.2d 132 (2004). [2] Marcovitz v.”
State on behalf of Tina K. v. Adam B., 948 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 2020). “STANDARD OF REVIEW Child custody determinations are matters initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial court, and although reviewed de novo on the record, the trial court’s determination will nor- mally be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion. 3 ANALYSIS [1-4] Parents…”
State v. Simnick, 771 N.W.2d 196 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a), the cause is submitted for decision without oral argument.”
Nathan v. McDermott, 945 N.W.2d 92 (Neb. 2020). “§ 2-111(B)(1) (rev. 2017). - 223 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports NATHAN v.”
Brumbaugh v. Bendorf, 945 N.W.2d 116 (Neb. 2020). “§ 2-111(B)(1) (rev. 2017). - 254 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports BRUMBAUGH v.”
State v. Vela-Montes, 844 N.W.2d 286 (Neb. 2014). “” We did not determine how much time remained on the speedy trial clock.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(A): 2 cases
State v. Malone, 957 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 2021). “22 [11] But to the extent our decision in Kays can be read to approve the underlying procedure used to amend the bill of exceptions in that case and in the case at issue, that aspect of the decision is overruled.”
Millennium Labs. v. Ward, 289 Neb. 718 (Neb. 2014).
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(B): 1 case
Millennium Labs. v. Ward, 289 Neb. 718 (Neb. 2014).
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(B)(1): 30 cases
State v. Shipler, 758 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 2-111(B)(1), this case was ordered submitted without oral argument.”
Marcovitz v. Rogers, 752 N.W.2d 605 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). “Rogers, 267 Neb. 456 , 675 N.W.2d 132 (2004). [2] Marcovitz v.”
State on behalf of Tina K. v. Adam B., 948 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 2020). “STANDARD OF REVIEW Child custody determinations are matters initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial court, and although reviewed de novo on the record, the trial court’s determination will nor- mally be affirmed absent an abuse of discretion. 3 ANALYSIS [1-4] Parents…”
Nathan v. McDermott, 945 N.W.2d 92 (Neb. 2020). “§ 2-111(B)(1) (rev. 2017). - 223 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports NATHAN v.”
Brumbaugh v. Bendorf, 945 N.W.2d 116 (Neb. 2020). “§ 2-111(B)(1) (rev. 2017). - 254 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports BRUMBAUGH v.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(B)(1)(a): 3 cases
State v. Britt, 963 N.W.2d 533 (Neb. 2021). “Postconviction Principles [2,3] Postconviction relief is available to a prisoner in cus- tody under sentence who seeks to be released on the ground that there was a denial or infringement of his or her constitu- tional rights such that the judgment was void or voidable.”
Npimnee v. Shiffermiller, 321 Neb. 700 (Neb. 2026).
State v. Delgado, No. A-25-604 (Neb. Ct. App. Mar. 17, 2026).
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(E)(4): 1 case
Jackson v. Rodriguez, 18 N.W.3d 408 (Neb. 2025).
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(E)(5)(a): 11 cases
State v. Yos-chiguil, 772 N.W.2d 574 (Neb. 2009). “02(1) is sufficient and that the advisement which was given to Yos-Chiguil substantially complied with those requirements.”
State v. Raatz, 885 N.W.2d 38 (Neb. 2016). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a) (rev. 2014), the case was submitted without oral argument.”
State v. Simnick, 771 N.W.2d 196 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 2-111(E)(5)(a), the cause is submitted for decision without oral argument.”
State v. Clark, 762 N.W.2d 64 (Neb. Ct. App. 2009).
State v. White, 755 N.W.2d 604 (Neb. 2008).
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-111(E)(6): 2 cases
Jackson v. Rodriguez, 18 N.W.3d 408 (Neb. 2025).
In re Interest of Antonio J., 886 N.W.2d 522 (Neb. 2016).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.