Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-205.01 (2026)

Judicial Branch Education Advisory Committee; powers

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) The Supreme Court may appoint a Judicial Branch Education Advisory Committee.

(2) The Judicial Branch Education Advisory Committee may:

(a) Develop for review by the Supreme Court standards and rules and regulations addressing such issues as the criteria for mandatory education for judges, criteria for approval of qualified activities, reporting requirements, sanctions for noncompliance, exemptions, and confidentiality of records;

(b) Develop for review by the Supreme Court standards and policies for education and training of all nonjudge judicial branch employees, including criteria for approval of qualified activities, reporting requirements, sanctions for noncompliance, and exemptions;

(c) Make recommendations to the State Court Administrator regarding budget requests and pursue grant funding;

(d) Develop for review by the Supreme Court policies regarding funding for travel and other related educational expenses for all employees for both instate and out-of-state travel; and

(e) Participate in additional activities as assigned by the Supreme Court in order to promote excellence in the administration of justice through quality education.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: State ex rel. Veskrna v. Steel, 296 Neb. 581 (Neb. 2017).
State ex rel. Veskrna v. Steel, 296 Neb. 581 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 11× “Steel argued that JBE records fell under the exception to the definition of public records, because such confidentiality is “authorized” by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-205.01 (Reissue 2016) and Neb.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-205.01(2): 1 case
State ex rel. Veskrna v. Steel, 296 Neb. 581 (Neb. 2017). “Steel argued that JBE records fell under the exception to the definition of public records, because such confidentiality is “authorized” by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-205.01 (Reissue 2016) and Neb.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-205.01(2)(a): 1 case
State ex rel. Veskrna v. Steel, 296 Neb. 581 (Neb. 2017). “Steel argued that JBE records fell under the exception to the definition of public records, because such confidentiality is “authorized” by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-205.01 (Reissue 2016) and Neb.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-205.01(2)(b): 1 case
State ex rel. Veskrna v. Steel, 296 Neb. 581 (Neb. 2017). “Steel argued that JBE records fell under the exception to the definition of public records, because such confidentiality is “authorized” by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-205.01 (Reissue 2016) and Neb.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.