Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1123 (2026)

Verdict; form; correction

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The verdict shall be written, signed by the foreman, and read by the clerk to the jury, and the inquiry made whether it is their verdict. If any juror disagrees, the jury must be sent out again; but if no disagreement be expressed, and neither party requires the jury to be polled, the verdict is complete, and the jury discharged from the case. If, however, the verdict be defective in form only, the same may, with the assent of the jury before they are discharged, be corrected by the court.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Snyder Ex Rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C., 605 N.W.2d 782 (Neb. 2000).
Snyder Ex Rel. Snyder v. Contemporary Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.C., 605 N.W.2d 782 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 4× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1123 (Reissue 1995) provides, in relevant part: The verdict shall be written, signed by the foreman, and read by the clerk to the jury, and the inquiry made whether it is their verdict.”
Harmon Cable Commc'ns of Nebraska Ltd. P'ship v. Scope Cable Television, Inc., 468 N.W.2d 350 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1123 (Reissue 1989) provides that “[i]f.”
Khaitov v. Greater Omaha Packing Co., 319 Neb. 932 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 2× “41 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1123 (Reissue 2016).”
Bailey v. AMISUB (Saint Joseph Hosp.), Inc., 489 N.W.2d 323 (Neb. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 11× “The trial court noticed that the verdict form was improperly signed by all 12 jurors, instead of by the foreman alone, as required by Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1123 (Reissue 1989).”
Eich v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 305 N.W.2d 621 (Neb. 1981). · cites it 4× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1123 (Reissue 1979) provides: "The verdict shall be written, signed by the foreman, and read by the clerk to the jury, and the inquiry made whether it is their verdict.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.