Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1243 (2026)

Oral examination, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An oral examination is an examination in the presence of the jury or tribunal which is to decide the fact or act upon it, the testimony being heard by the jury or tribunal from the lips of the witness.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–1998 · leading case: Kimball v. Neb. Dept. of Motor Vehs., 586 N.W.2d 439 (Neb. 1998).
Kimball v. Neb. Dept. of Motor Vehs., 586 N.W.2d 439 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 7× “At the outset of the hearing, Kimball objected to the hearing's being held telephonically in a hearing where the formal rules of evidence were to apply, claiming that Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-1243 (Reissue 1995) precluded a telephonic hearing where the formal rules of evidence were in…”
Schroeder v. Barnes, 565 N.W.2d 749 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 25-1240 (Reissue 1995), which provides for the means of taking oral testimony, and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1243 (Reissue 1995), which provides, “An oral examination is an examination in the presence of the jury or tribunal which is to decide the fact or act upon it, the testimony…”
Kimball v. Nebraska Dep't of Motor Vehs., 586 N.W.2d 439 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 7× “At the outset of the hearing, Kimball objected to the hearing’s being held telephonically in a hearing where the formal rules of evidence were to apply, claiming that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-1243 (Reissue 1995) precluded a telephonic hearing where the formal rules of evidence were…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.