Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2124 (2026)

Ejectment; complaint; allegations

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In an action for the recovery of real property, it shall be sufficient if the complaint states that the plaintiff has a legal estate therein, and is entitled to the possession thereof, describing the same, and that the defendant unlawfully keeps the plaintiff out of the possession. It shall not be necessary to state how the plaintiff's estate or ownership is derived.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1949–2021 · leading case: K & K Farming, Inc. v. Fed. Intermediate Credit Bank, 468 N.W.2d 99 (Neb. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
K & K Farming, Inc. v. Fed. Intermediate Credit Bank, 468 N.W.2d 99 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 2× “2d 192 (1960); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2124 (Reissue 1989).”
Beckner v. Urban, 309 Neb. 677 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “He admitted 2 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2124 (Reissue 2016) (plaintiff has legal estate; plaintiff is entitled to possession, describing real property; and defendant unlawfully keeps plaintiff out of possession).”
Baskins v. Krepcik, 43 N.W.2d 624 (Neb. 1950). · cites it 3× “These provisions are now sections 25-2124 and 25-2126, R.R.S.1943.”
I.P. Homeowners, Inc. v. Morrow, 668 N.W.2d 515 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-2124 through 25-2136 (Reissue 1995 & Cum.”
Abbas v. Demont, 40 N.W.2d 265 (Neb. 1949). “§ 25-2124, R. R. S. 1943. It is the general rule that ejectment may be maintained by a vendor of real property against his vendee in possession under an executory contract of sale where the vendee is in default and the contract of sale provides that time is of the essence and…”
Grand Lodge Ind. O. of of of Neb. v. Marvin, 369 N.W.2d 54 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “Despite this confusion, the Grand Lodge managed to file a petition which complied with Neb.Rev.Stat. § 25-2124 (Reissue 1979): In an action for the recovery of real property, it shall be sufficient if the plaintiff states in his petition that he has a legal estate therein, and…”
Johnston v. Robertson, 106 N.W.2d 192 (Neb. 1960). · cites it 2× “, plaintiffs, v. Richard D. Ferguson et al., defendants.”
Curtis v. GIFF, 757 N.W.2d 139 (Neb. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “See, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2124 (Cum. Supp. 2006); K & K Farming v.”
Grand Lodge Indep. Order of Odd Fellows v. Marvin, 369 N.W.2d 54 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “Despite this confusion, the Grand Lodge managed to file a petition which complied with Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-2124 (Reissue 1979): In an action for the recovery of real property, it shall be sufficient if the plaintiff states in his petition that he has a legal estate therein, and…”
Stamm v. Fisher (Neb. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Based upon our de novo review, and giving due weight to the trial court’s findings made following a bench trial, we find the Fishers established their adverse possession of the disputed property by a preponderance of the evidence. Stamm’s Theory of Ejection, Motion for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.