Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-319 (2026)

Class actions; representation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When the question is one of a common or general interest of many persons, or when the parties are very numerous, and it may be impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of all.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases, 1945–2018 · leading case: Nesbitt Ex Rel. Himself & All Other Similarly Situated Neb. State Penitentiary Segregated Prisoners v. Frakes, 300 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nesbitt Ex Rel. Himself & All Other Similarly Situated Neb. State Penitentiary Segregated Prisoners v. Frakes, 300 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “Class actions are authorized under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-319 (Reissue 2016), which provides: "When the question is one of a common or general interest of many persons, or when the parties are very numerous, and it may be impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or…”
Blankenship v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist., 237 N.W.2d 86 (Neb. 1976). · cites it 4× “The question for determination in this case is whether the plaintiff was entitled to maintain this action as representative of a class under the provisions of section 25-319, R. R. S. 1943. The defendant is a public power district and political subdivision of the State of…”
Lynch v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 745 N.W.2d 291 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 3× “[13] Class actions are authorized under Neb. Rev.Stat. § 25-319 (Reissue 1995), which provides: "When the question is one of a common or general interest of many persons, or when the parties are very numerous, and it may be impracticable to bring them all before the court, one…”
Hoiengs v. Cnty. of Adams, 516 N.W.2d 223 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “Class actions are authorized under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-319 (Reissue 1989), which provides: “When the question is one of a common or general interest of many persons, or when the parties are very numerous, and it may be impracticable to bring them all before the court, one or…”
Keef v. State, Dep't of Motor Vehs., 634 N.W.2d 751 (Neb. 2001). · cites it 2× “See, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-319 (Reissue 1995); O’Connor v.”
Riha Farms, Inc. v. Cnty. of Sarpy, 322 N.W.2d 797 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 4× “The District Court therefore specifically found that the finding and decision of the Sarpy County Board of Equalization as to the valuation placed on plaintiff's agricultural land for 1980 was correct, and affirmed the action of the county board.”
Obstetricians-Gynecologists, P.C. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 361 N.W.2d 550 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “The trial court held that OB-GYN failed to prove that there were other members of the class which OB-GYN sought to represent and which satisfied the requirements of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-319 (Reissue 1979): “Class actions; representation.”
Mullendore v. Sch. D. No. 1 of Lancaster Cty., 388 N.W.2d 93 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-319 (Reissue 1985). In his amended petition filed on June 20, 1983, Mullendore, “on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,” asserted two causes of action regarding L.”
Presbyterian Theological Seminary v. Harrington, 36 N.W.2d 577 (Neb. 1949). · cites it 2× “In conformity therewith and predicated upon the foregoing admitted facts, recited in its petition therein, plaintiff, on December 9, 1944, filed a class action under section 25-319, R. S. 1943, in the district court for Douglas County, naming as defendants the following persons,…”
Archer v. Musick, 25 N.W.2d 908 (Neb. 1947). · cites it 2× “” Clearly, the allegations of plaintiff’s petition do not premise his action upon any such theory or bring it in any manner within the purview of the above quoted statute.”
Hall v. Cox Cable of Omaha, Inc., 327 N.W.2d 595 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 2× “After then alleging that this is a proper class action under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-319 (Reissue 1979) and is an action brought pursuant to the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, §§ 25-21,149 to 25-21,164, Hall identifies the various appellees, who are the City of Omaha, its…”
May v. City of Kearney, 17 N.W.2d 448 (Neb. 1945). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff May represents himself as a voter and taxpayer who brings the action for himself and all others similarly situated as provided in section 25-319, R. S. 1943. Therefore, he represents both himself and the public, the electorate and taxpayers of the city of Kearney.”
Show all 27 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.