Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 25
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-910 (2026)

Notice of motion; contents

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Where notice of a motion is required, it must be in writing and shall state (1) the names of the parties to the action or proceeding in which it is to be made, (2) the name of the court or judge before whom it is to be made, (3) the place where and the day on which it will be heard, (4) the nature and terms of the order or orders to be applied for, and (5) if affidavits are to be used on the hearing, the notice shall state that fact. It shall be served a reasonable time before the hearing.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1976–2021 · leading case: Lombardo v. Sedlacek, 908 N.W.2d 630 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lombardo v. Sedlacek, 908 N.W.2d 630 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 5× “Sedlacek's reliance on Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-910 (Reissue 2016) does not alter our analysis.”
Bryson L. v. Izabella L., 921 N.W.2d 829 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “4-2 (rev. 2005); Rules of Dist. Ct. of Eighth Jud.”
Eletech, Inc. v. Conveyance Consulting Grp., 956 N.W.2d 692 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 4× “§ 25-910 (Reissue 2016), where notice of a motion is required, it must be served a reasonable time before the hearing.”
Seldin v. Est. of Silverman, 939 N.W.2d 768 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 3× “The Arizona Seldins’ notice complied with Nebraska’s statutory notice requirements; thus, the notice requirements under § 12 of the FAA were satisfied.”
Howard v. Howard, 242 N.W.2d 884 (Neb. 1976). · cites it 2× “Section 25-910, R. R. S., 1943, provides where notice of a motion is required, and it is in this instance, it shall be served a reasonable time before hearing.”
Gen. Serv. Bureau, Inc. v. Moller, 672 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-910 (Reissue 1995) provides: Where notice of a motion is required, it must be in writing and shall state (1) the names of the parties to the action or proceeding in which it is to be made, (2) the name of the court or judge before [which or] whom it is to be…”
Galaxy Telecom, L.L.C. v. SRS, Inc., 689 N.W.2d 866 (Neb. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-910 (Reissue 1995) requires that when notice of a motion is required and if affidavits are to be used on the hearing, the notice shall state that fact.”
Yunghans v. O'TOOLE, 258 N.W.2d 810 (Neb. 1977). “See §§ 25-910 and 25-1330 to 25-1336, R. R. S.”
Lombardo v. Sedlacek, 299 Neb. 400 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 5× “Sedlacek’s reliance on Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-910 (Reissue 2016) does not alter our analysis.”
Pittack v. Pittack, No. A-18-487 (Neb. Ct. App. Mar. 12, 2019). · cites it 2× “See, also, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-910 (Reissue 2016) (where notice of motion is required, it must be in writing and served reasonable time before hearing on motion).”
Bryson L. v. Izabella L., 302 Neb. 145 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “hearing within 10 12 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-910 (Reissue 2016).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.