Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 27
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-102 (2026)

Rule 102. Purpose and construction

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

These rules shall be construed to secure fairness in administration, elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay, and promotion of growth and development of the law of evidence to the end that the truth may be ascertained and proceedings justly determined.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1955–2026 · leading case: Crowder v. Aurora Co-Operative Elevator Co., 393 N.W.2d 250 (Neb. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Crowder v. Aurora Co-Operative Elevator Co., 393 N.W.2d 250 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 2× “102 ( Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-102 (Reissue 1985)), which provides: “These rules shall be construed to secure fairness in administration, elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay, and promotion of growth and development of the law of evidence to the end that the truth may be…”
Gibson v. City of Lincoln, 376 N.W.2d 785 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-102 (Reissue 1979). Gibson does not argue that the facts or medical data used by Dr.”
State v. King, 250 N.W.2d 655 (Neb. 1977). · cites it 2× “Section 27-102, R. R. S. 1943, states: “These rules shall be construed to secure fairness in administration, elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay, and promotion of growth and development of the law of evidence to the end that the truth may be ascertained and…”
State v. Munn, 322 N.W.2d 429 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 2× “) Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-102 (Reissue 1979) states: “These rules shall be construed to secure fairness in administration, elimination of unjustifiable expense and delay, and promotion of growth and development of the law of evidence to the end that the truth may be ascertained and…”
Muff v. Mahloch Farms Co., 181 N.W.2d 258 (Neb. 1970). · cites it 2× “Section 27-102, R. R. S. 1943, fixes the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace not on the basis of the amount of the judgment ultimately entered but on the basis of “the sum in question.”
Schmieding v. Am. Farmers Mut. Ins. Co., 138 F. Supp. 167 (D. Neb. 1955). · cites it 2× “By Section 27-102, R.S.Neb.1943, Reissue of 1948, it is provided with presently immaterial exception that: “Justices of the peace shall have jurisdiction in all cases where the sum in question does not exceed two hundred dollars.”
In re Interest of Aaden S., 329 Neb. 785 (Neb. 2026). · cites it 2× “52 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-102 (Reissue 2016). - 808 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 320 Nebraska Reports IN RE INTEREST OF AADEN S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.