Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 27
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-105 (2026)

Rule 105. Limited admissibility

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the judge, upon request, shall restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1989–2023 · leading case: State v. Rocha, 890 N.W.2d 178 (Neb. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Rocha, 890 N.W.2d 178 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “105, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-105 (Reissue 2016). 67 § 27-401.”
State v. Oldson, 884 N.W.2d 10 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “105, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-105 (Reissue 2008). Under rule 105, “[w]hen evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the judge, upon request, shall restrict the evidence to its proper…”
State v. Esch, 315 Neb. 482 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 2× “482 to offer this evidence at trial to prove Esch’s motivation for the murder and that the murder was premeditated. The dis- trict court ruled that the evidence was admissible for those purposes.”
State v. Messersmith, 473 N.W.2d 83 (Neb. 1991). · cites it 2× “105, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-105 (Reissue 1989) (restrictive instruction on proper use of evidence which is admissible for one purpose, but not another).”
State v. Ryan, 444 N.W.2d 610 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 2× “Defendant points to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-105 (Reissue 1985), which states: “When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the judge, upon request, shall restrict the evidence to its…”
State v. Wheeler, 989 N.W.2d 728 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 2× “” 28 The Legislature has provided that an information shall not be deemed invalid “for stating the time imperfectly.”
State v. Perrigo, 510 N.W.2d 304 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “105 ( Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-105 (Reissue 1989)).”
State v. Fessler (Neb. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-105 (Reissue 2008) states that when evidence is admissible for one purpose, but not another purpose, the trial court judge, upon request, shall restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.