Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1301.01 (2026)

Venue; crime committed in different counties

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If any person shall commit an offense against the person of another, such accused person may be tried in the county in which the offense is committed, or in any county into or out of which the person upon whom the offense was committed may, in the prosecution of the offense, have been brought, or in which an act is done by the accused in instigating, procuring, promoting, or aiding in the commission of the offense, or in aiding, abetting, or procuring another to commit such offense.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1974–2022 · leading case: State v. Ellis, 303 N.W.2d 741 (Neb. 1981).
State v. Ellis, 303 N.W.2d 741 (Neb. 1981). · cites it 11× “" Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-1301.01 (Reissue 1979).”
State v. Lee, 304 Neb. 252 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 5× “5, arguing that it incor- rectly incorporated language from Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1301.01 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Kern, 397 N.W.2d 23 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 4× “The first assignment of error rests upon Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-1301.01 (Reissue 1985), which provides: If any person shall commit an offense against the person of another, such accused person may be tried in the county in which the offense is committed, or in any county into or out…”
State v. Godek, 981 N.W.2d 810 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 3× “Because we have already rejected his elements argument, his other arguments also fail. We need not give further consider- ation to his other assignments of error.”
State v. Phelps, 490 N.W.2d 676 (Neb. 1992). · cites it 2× “However, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1301.01 (Reissue 1989) provides that if an offense is committed against the person of another, the accused may be tried in the county in which the offense is committed, or in any county into or out of which the victim may have been brought in the…”
State v. Bird Head, 408 N.W.2d 309 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 2× “We recently reaffirmed the rule that under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1301.01 (Reissue 1985), a motion for a change of venue is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge and that the trial judge’s ruling will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of that…”
State v. Tiff, 260 N.W.2d 296 (Neb. 1977). · cites it 2× “1943, provides that if an offense is committed against the person of another, the accused may be tried in the county in which the offense is committed, or in any county into or out of which the victim may have been brought in the prosecution of the offense, or in which an act is…”
State v. McHenry, 550 N.W.2d 364 (Neb. 1996). “03 or sections 29-1301.01 to 29-1301.03, or unless it shall appear to the court by affidavits that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had therein.”
State v. Meers, 598 N.W.2d 435 (Neb. 1999). “03 or sections 29-1301.01 to 29-1301.03, or unless it shall appear to the court by affidavits that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had therein.”
State v. Simants, 236 N.W.2d 794 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 2× “, 1975, provides: "All criminal cases shall be tried in the county where the offense was committed, except as otherwise provided in sections 29-1301.01 to 29-1301.03 or section 24-903, or unless it shall appear to the court by affidavits that a fair and impartial trial cannot be…”
State v. Lindsey, 227 N.W.2d 599 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 2× “Moreover, section 29-1301.01, R. R. S. 1943, provides: “If any person shall commit an offense against the person of another, such accused person may be tried in the *447 county in which the offense is committed, or in any county into or out of which the person upon whom the…”
State v. Garza, 214 N.W.2d 30 (Neb. 1974). · cites it 2× “Our statute, section 29-1301.01, R. R. S. 1943, permits the trial to proceed in the county where the offense is committed or in any county into or out of which the person upon whom the offense was committed may, in the prosecution of the offense, have been brought, or in which…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.