Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4001 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 29-4001 to 29-4014 shall be known and may be cited as the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 54 cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: State v. Ratumaimuri, 299 Neb. 887 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Ratumaimuri, 299 Neb. 887 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 3× “Upon further review from a judgment of the Nebraska Court of Appeals, the Nebraska Supreme Court will not reverse a judgment which it deems to be correct simply because its reasoning differs from that employed by the Court of Appeals.”
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 883 N.W.2d 363 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 2× “It provides that a court shall not grant such a per- son custody, unsupervised parenting time, visitation, or other 2 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-4001 to 29-4014 (Reissue 2008, Cum.”
State v. Gibson, 302 Neb. 833 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “Gibson was also subject to the Sex Offender Registration Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-4001 to 29-4014 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Schreiner, 754 N.W.2d 742 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 2× “[70] Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-4001 to 29-4014 (Cum.”
Slansky v. Nebraska State Patrol, 685 N.W.2d 335 (Neb. 2004). · cites it 3× “After his release *362 from prison, Slansky moved to Nebraska and the Nebraska State Patrol (NSP), pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4001 et seq. (Cum. Supp.”
State v. Torres, 574 N.W.2d 153 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 4× “The district court sentenced Torres to 1 year's probation and informed him of his duty to comply with Nebraska's Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Neb.Rev. Stat. § 29-4001 et seq. (Cum.Supp.”
Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008). “§§ 46-23-501 to 46-23-507 (2007); Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-4001 to 29-4013 (2003 and Supp.”
State v. Payan, 765 N.W.2d 192 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 2× “CONCLUSION In summary, we conclude that the finding that Payan committed an aggravated offense was properly made by the trial judge for purposes of the lifetime registration provisions of SORA, which are civil in nature, but the question should have been submitted to the jury…”
State v. Hamilton, 763 N.W.2d 731 (Neb. 2009). · cites it 2× “CONCLUSION For the reasons discussed, we affirm the judgment of the district court sentencing Hamilton to terms of incarceration for each of the two offenses for which he was convicted and imposing the requirements of lifetime registration and community supervision.”
State v. Schneider, 640 N.W.2d 8 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 2× “We affirm because the registration requirement under Nebraska’s Sex Offender Registration Act (Act), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-4001 to 29-4013 (Cum.”
State v. Nuss, 781 N.W.2d 60 (Neb. 2010). · cites it 2× “Chrobak , [3] an Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals case with similar facts, it is unlikely that the issuing judge would have disagreed with the affiant's characterization of the images reviewed by the affiant as child pornography, *71 and it is likewise unlikely that the issuing…”
Doe v. Nebraska, 898 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (D. Neb. 2012). · cites it 4× “The Doe Plaintiffs & Experts The parties stipulate that all plaintiffs are required to register under Nebraska’s Sex Offender Registration Act and are subject to the provisions of Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 29-4001 to 29-4014, with the exception of John and Jane Does B and D-K.”
Show all 54 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.