(1) Information obtained under
the Sex Offender Registration Act shall not be
confidential, except that the following information shall only
be disclosed to law enforcement agencies, including federal or state probation
or parole agencies, if appropriate:
(a) A sex
offender's social security number;
(b) Any references to arrests of a sex
offender that did not result in conviction;
(c) A sex offender's travel or immigration
document information;
(d) A sex offender's remote communication device identifiers and
addresses;
(e) A sex offender's email addresses, instant messaging identifiers,
chat room identifiers, global unique identifiers, and other Internet communication
identifiers;
(f) A sex offender's telephone numbers;
(g) A sex offender's
motor vehicle operator's license information or state identification card
number; and
(h) The name of any employer of a sex offender.
(2) The identity of any victim
of a sex offense shall not be released.
(3) The
release of information authorized by this section shall conform with the rules
and regulations adopted and promulgated by the Nebraska State Patrol pursuant
to section 29-4013.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2021 · leading case:
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 883 N.W.2d 363 (Neb. 2016).
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 883 N.W.2d 363 (Neb. 2016).
· cites it 3× “”36 Both § 29-4009 and § 29-4013(4) impose restrictions on who can access infor- mation in the sex offender registry, and these statutes do not include courts or private parties to a custody dispute.”
Doe v. Nebraska, 734 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Neb. 2010).
· cites it 10× “Right to the confidentiality of the registry information, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-4009 (Rev. 2006); e. Ability to have the sentencing court exempt certain defendants from the obligations of registration, Neb.”
Slansky v. Nebraska State Patrol, 685 N.W.2d 335 (Neb. 2004).
· cites it 4× “§ 29-4009. As previously mentioned, whether it is necessary to notify the public under § 29-4009(3) is essentially a question whether the offender is at a high risk to reoffend.”
A.W. Ex Rel. Doe v. Nebraska, 865 F.3d 1014 (8th Cir. 2017).
“” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4009 (1). Further, the Nebraska State Patrol (NSP)—the agency tasked by SORA with adopting and promulgating rules and regulations to carry out SORA’s registration provisions and for the release of information ' under § 29-4009, id.”
Welvaert v. Nebraska State Patrol, 683 N.W.2d 357 (Neb. 2004).
“) § 29-4009(3). By limiting dissemination to information that is relevant to public safety, SORA shields offenders from the publication of irrelevant personal information.”
Doe I v. Peterson (D. Neb. 2021).
· cites it 3× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4009 (3). “The procedures for release of information established by the Nebraska State Patrol shall provide for law enforcement and public notification using electronic systems.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4009(1) — 4 cases
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 883 N.W.2d 363 (Neb. 2016).
“”36 Both § 29-4009 and § 29-4013(4) impose restrictions on who can access infor- mation in the sex offender registry, and these statutes do not include courts or private parties to a custody dispute.”
Slansky v. Nebraska State Patrol, 685 N.W.2d 335 (Neb. 2004).
“§ 29-4009. As previously mentioned, whether it is necessary to notify the public under § 29-4009(3) is essentially a question whether the offender is at a high risk to reoffend.”
Doe v. Nebraska, 734 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Neb. 2010).
“Right to the confidentiality of the registry information, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-4009 (Rev. 2006); e. Ability to have the sentencing court exempt certain defendants from the obligations of registration, Neb.”
Doe I v. Peterson (D. Neb. 2021).
“” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4009 (3). “The procedures for release of information established by the Nebraska State Patrol shall provide for law enforcement and public notification using electronic systems.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4009(3) — 2 cases
Slansky v. Nebraska State Patrol, 685 N.W.2d 335 (Neb. 2004).
“§ 29-4009. As previously mentioned, whether it is necessary to notify the public under § 29-4009(3) is essentially a question whether the offender is at a high risk to reoffend.”
Welvaert v. Nebraska State Patrol, 683 N.W.2d 357 (Neb. 2004).
“) § 29-4009(3). By limiting dissemination to information that is relevant to public safety, SORA shields offenders from the publication of irrelevant personal information.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4009(7) — 1 case
Doe v. Nebraska, 734 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Neb. 2010).
“Right to the confidentiality of the registry information, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-4009 (Rev. 2006); e. Ability to have the sentencing court exempt certain defendants from the obligations of registration, Neb.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-4009(l)(d) — 1 case
Doe v. Nebraska, 734 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Neb. 2010).
“Right to the confidentiality of the registry information, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 29-4009 (Rev. 2006); e. Ability to have the sentencing court exempt certain defendants from the obligations of registration, Neb.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.