Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-204 (2026)

Airport hazards; municipality; easements; acquire; right of eminent domain; effect on zoning

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Where necessary, in order to provide unobstructed air space for the landing and taking off of aircraft utilizing airports or restricted landing areas acquired or operated under the provisions of sections 3-201 to 3-238 and 18-1502, every municipality is authorized to acquire, in the same manner as is provided for the acquisition of property for airport purposes, easements through or other interests in air spaces over land or water, interests in airport hazards outside the boundaries of the airports or restricted landing areas and such other airport protection privileges as are necessary to insure safe approaches to the landing areas of said airports or restricted landing areas and the safe and efficient operation thereof. It is also hereby authorized to acquire, in the same manner, the right or easement, for a term of years or perpetually, to place or maintain suitable marks for the daytime marking and suitable lights for the nighttime marking of airport hazards, including the right of ingress and egress to or from such airport hazards, for the purpose of maintaining and repairing such lights and marks. This authority shall not be so construed as to limit any right, power or authority to zone property adjacent to airports and restricted landing areas under the provisions of any law of this state.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1962–1995 · leading case: Johnson v. Airport Auth. of City of Omaha, 115 N.W.2d 426 (Neb. 1962).
Johnson v. Airport Auth. of City of Omaha, 115 N.W.2d 426 (Neb. 1962). · cites it 16× “This was done pursuant to power regularly granted to it by section 3-204, R.R.S.1943, and in accordance with the provisions of statute and of the Nebraska Constitution relating to the taking and damaging of private property for public use, the character of which was in…”
Fiese v. Sitorius, 526 N.W.2d 86 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-204 (Reissue 1991). This court has ruled that the condemnation of an *230 avigation easement is a taking, as that term is defined within the context of Fifth Amendment jurisprudence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.