In order to prevent the creation or establishment of airport hazards, every political subdivision that has an airport hazard area within the area of its zoning jurisdiction shall adopt, administer, and enforce, under the police power and in the manner and upon the conditions prescribed in the Airport Zoning Act, airport zoning regulations for such airport hazard area. The regulations shall meet the minimum regulations as prescribed by the Division of Aeronautics of the Department of Transportation and may divide such area into zones and, within such zones, specify the land uses permitted and regulate and restrict the height to which structures may be erected and trees allowed to grow, except that a political subdivision or a joint airport zoning board provided for in section 3-304 may include modifications or exceptions to the airport zoning regulations adopted under the Airport Zoning Act that the political subdivision or joint airport zoning board deems appropriate. Such modifications and exceptions shall not be considered a conflict for purposes of section 3-306. The authority of a political subdivision to adopt airport zoning regulations shall not be conditional upon prior adoption of a comprehensive development plan or a comprehensive zoning ordinance.
Notes of Decisions
Gottsch v. Bank of Stapleton, 458 N.W.2d 443 (Neb. 1990).
· cites it 2× “§ 3-303 (Reissue 1980). If Meier v. Geldis had been decided after Nebraska adoption of the U.”
Groseth v. Groseth, 600 N.W.2d 159 (Neb. 1999).
“209D, § 3-303 (1998) (setting forth application of law of this state); § 42-739, with Mass.”
State Ex Rel. Couns. for Dis. v. Frye, 771 N.W.2d 571 (Neb. 2009).
· cites it 2× “4, and disciplinary rules §§ 3-303(B), 3-309(E), and 3-321, as well as her oath of office as an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Nebraska.”
John Deere Co. v. Boelus State Bank, 448 N.W.2d 163 (Neb. 1989).
“§ 3-303(b) (Reissue 1980). The record shows that John Deere was in possession of the cashier’s check drawn on the defendant bank and which was payable to the order of John Deere.”
State v. Spaulding, 319 N.W.2d 449 (Neb. 1982).
· cites it 2× “§ 3-303 (Reissue 1980) is applicable and establishes that the defendant did not receive value or “present value” for the $600 draft deposited in the bank on July 27, 1979.”
Prososki v. Regan, 321 Neb. 38 (Neb. 2026).
“36 See § 3-303(B). See, also, State ex rel. Counsel for Dis.”
Prososki v. Regan, 321 Neb. 38 (Neb. 2026).
“36 See § 3-303(B). See, also, State ex rel. Counsel for Dis.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-303(B) — 3 cases
State Ex Rel. Couns. for Dis. v. Frye, 771 N.W.2d 571 (Neb. 2009).
“4, and disciplinary rules §§ 3-303(B), 3-309(E), and 3-321, as well as her oath of office as an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Nebraska.”
Prososki v. Regan, 321 Neb. 38 (Neb. 2026).
“36 See § 3-303(B). See, also, State ex rel. Counsel for Dis.”
Prososki v. Regan, 321 Neb. 38 (Neb. 2026).
“36 See § 3-303(B). See, also, State ex rel. Counsel for Dis.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-303(b) — 1 case
John Deere Co. v. Boelus State Bank, 448 N.W.2d 163 (Neb. 1989).
“§ 3-303(b) (Reissue 1980). The record shows that John Deere was in possession of the cashier’s check drawn on the defendant bank and which was payable to the order of John Deere.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.