Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 3
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-408 (2026)

Violations; penalty

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person, firm, or corporation (1) violating any of the provisions of sections 3-401 to 3-409, (2) submitting false information in the application for a permit, (3) violating any rule or regulation adopted and promulgated by the Division of Aeronautics of the Department of Transportation pursuant to sections 3-401 to 3-409, (4) failing to do and perform any act required by sections 3-401 to 3-409, or (5) violating the terms of any permit issued pursuant to sections 3-401 to 3-409, shall be guilty of a Class III misdemeanor. Each day any violation continues or any structure erected in violation of sections 3-401 to 3-409 shall continue in existence shall constitute a separate offense.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2021 · leading case: Barelmann v. Fox, 478 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Barelmann v. Fox, 478 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1992). “§ 3-408 (Reissue 1980). However, the Barelmanns allege that Sharon Barelmann was not a party to the original note creating the indebtedness represented by the April 19 note, and, thus, the April 19 note is not valid as to her.”
First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Kizzier, 275 N.W.2d 600 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 2× “Comment 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, section 3-408, explains that: no consideration is necessary for an instrument given as security “for a debt already owed by the party giving it, or by a third person.”
Newman Grove Creamery Co. v. Deaver, 302 N.W.2d 697 (Neb. 1981). “§ 3-408 (Reissue 1971) states in part: “Want or failure of consideration is a defense as against any person not having the rights of a holder in due course (section 3-305), except that no consideration is necessary for an instrument or obligation thereon given in payment of or…”
Buffalo Cnty. v. Richards, 326 N.W.2d 179 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 2× “§ 3-408, Comment 3 (Reissue 1980). In Chonowski v.”
Ogallala Livestock Auction Mkt. v. Leonard, 30 Neb. Ct. App. 335 (Neb. Ct. App. 2021). “§ 3-408 (Reissue 2020), which provides that a check or other draft does not of itself oper- ate as an assignment of any funds in the hands of the drawee available for its payment and that the drawee is not liable on - 341 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 30 Nebraska…”
Sanitary & Improvement Dist. No. 32 v. Cont'l W. Corp., 343 N.W.2d 314 (Neb. 1983). “§ 3-408 (Reissue 1980). We conclude that the trial court’s finding that such warrants as may be in the hands of Continental Western are valid, enforceable obligations of the district is clearly wrong.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.