For the purpose of the construction, leasing, improvement, maintenance, and management of an aviation field and for the payment of persons employed in the performance of labor in connection therewith, any county may, without a vote of the legal electors, levy an annual tax of not to exceed three and five-tenths cents on each one hundred dollars of taxable value of all the taxable property in such county subject to section 77-3443. No part of the funds so levied and collected shall be used for any other purpose.
Notes of Decisions
FirsTier Bank, N. A. v. Triplett, 497 N.W.2d 339 (Neb. 1993).
· cites it 30× “ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR Restated, the sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in granting a money judgment on a promissory note that had been marked "paid" and returned to the maker.”
J. J. Schaefer Livestock Hauling, Inc. v. Gretna State Bank, 428 N.W.2d 185 (Neb. 1988).
· cites it 6× “§ 3-605 (Reissue 1980) provides: (1) The holder of an instrument may even without consideration discharge any party (a) in any manner apparent on the face of the instrument or the indorsement, as by intentionally cancelling the instrument or the party’s signature by destruction…”
Walker v. Probandt, 25 Neb. Ct. App. 30 (Neb. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 5× “§ 3-605 (Reissue 2001). We conclude that this defense has been waived.”
Gorham v. John F. Kennedy Coll., Inc., 217 N.W.2d 919 (Neb. 1974).
· cites it 2× “Section 3-605, U. C. C., provides: “(1) The holder of an instrument may even without consideration discharge any-party * * * “(b)j- by renouncing his rights by a writing.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-605(1): 1 case
FirsTier Bank, N. A. v. Triplett, 497 N.W.2d 339 (Neb. 1993).
“ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR Restated, the sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in granting a money judgment on a promissory note that had been marked "paid" and returned to the maker.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-605(f): 1 case
Walker v. Probandt, 25 Neb. Ct. App. 30 (Neb. Ct. App. 2017).
“§ 3-605 (Reissue 2001). We conclude that this defense has been waived.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-605(g): 1 case
Walker v. Probandt, 25 Neb. Ct. App. 30 (Neb. Ct. App. 2017).
“§ 3-605 (Reissue 2001). We conclude that this defense has been waived.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-605(l)(a): 1 case
J. J. Schaefer Livestock Hauling, Inc. v. Gretna State Bank, 428 N.W.2d 185 (Neb. 1988).
“§ 3-605 (Reissue 1980) provides: (1) The holder of an instrument may even without consideration discharge any party (a) in any manner apparent on the face of the instrument or the indorsement, as by intentionally cancelling the instrument or the party’s signature by destruction…”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 3-605(l)(b): 1 case
J. J. Schaefer Livestock Hauling, Inc. v. Gretna State Bank, 428 N.W.2d 185 (Neb. 1988).
“§ 3-605 (Reissue 1980) provides: (1) The holder of an instrument may even without consideration discharge any party (a) in any manner apparent on the face of the instrument or the indorsement, as by intentionally cancelling the instrument or the party’s signature by destruction…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.