Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 30
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2439 (2026)

Supervised administration; nature of proceeding

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Supervised administration is a single in rem proceeding to secure complete administration and settlement of a decedent's estate under the continuing authority of the court which extends until entry of an order approving distribution of the estate and discharging the personal representative or other order terminating the proceeding. A supervised personal representative is responsible to the court, as well as to the interested parties, and is subject to directions concerning the estate made by the court on its own motion or on the motion of any interested party. Except as otherwise provided in this part, or as otherwise ordered by the court, a supervised personal representative has the same duties and powers as a personal representative who is not supervised.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1989–1994 · leading case: In Re Est. of Snover, 443 N.W.2d 894 (Neb. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Est. of Snover, 443 N.W.2d 894 (Neb. 1989). “With respect to Line’s contention that the district court erred in finding that his payment of attorney and personal representative fees was contrary to an order for supervised administration, § 30-2439 provides: A supervised personal representative is responsible to the court,…”
Kenner v. Blue Valley Lutheran Homes Soc'y, Inc., 524 N.W.2d 571 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 30-2439 through 30-2443 (Reissue 1989).”
Kenner v. Blue Valley Lutheran Homes Soc'y, Inc., 513 N.W.2d 35 (Neb. Ct. App. 1994). “The most intense level of court involvement is described in article 24, part 5, “Supervised Administration,” §§ 30-2439 through 30-2443. Pursuant to supervised administration, the court determines which will should be probated and which personal representative should be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.