Termination of appointment of a personal representative occurs as indicated in sections 30-2452 to 30-2455. Termination ends the right and power pertaining to the office of personal representative as conferred by this code or any will, except that a personal representative, at any time prior to distribution or until restrained or enjoined by court order, may perform acts necessary to protect the estate and may deliver the assets to a successor representative. Termination does not discharge a personal representative from liability for transactions or omissions occurring before termination, or relieve him of the duty to preserve assets subject to his control, to account therefor and to deliver the assets. Termination does not affect the jurisdiction of the court over the personal representative, but terminates his authority to represent the estate in any pending or future proceeding.
Notes of Decisions
Abbott v. Sellon (In Re Est.), 299 Neb. 596 (Neb. 2018).
· cites it 2× “26 In In re Estate of Muncillo , 27 we held that the court's denial of an application to appoint a special administrator pursuant to § 30-2451(2) was a final order. As already described, § 30-2451(2) grants to a person interested in the estate the right to petition for…”
MacH v. Schmer, 550 N.W.2d 385 (Neb. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 6× “A personal representative’s appointment may also be terminated pursuant to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2451 (Reissue 1995).”
Henderson State Co. v. Garrelts, 319 Neb. 485 (Neb. 2025).
· cites it 3× “Nor did the posttermination action purport to protect any such 42 See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2451 (Reissue 2016).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2451(2) — 1 case
Abbott v. Sellon (In Re Est.), 299 Neb. 596 (Neb. 2018).
“26 In In re Estate of Muncillo , 27 we held that the court's denial of an application to appoint a special administrator pursuant to § 30-2451(2) was a final order. As already described, § 30-2451(2) grants to a person interested in the estate the right to petition for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.