Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 36-104 (2026)
Interest in land; how created; devises; trusts by operation of law
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 36-103 shall not be construed to affect in any manner the power of a testator in the disposition of his real estate by a last will and testament, nor to prevent any trust from arising or being extinguished by implication or operation of law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1947–2026 · leading case: I. P. Homeowners, Inc. v. Radtke, 558 N.W.2d 582 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997).
I. P. Homeowners, Inc. v. Radtke, 558 N.W.2d 582 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997). “shall hereafter be created, granted, assigned, surrendered, or declared, unless by operation of law, or by deed of conveyance in writing, subscribed by the party creating, granting, assigning, surrendering or declaring the same”); Neb. Rev. Stat. § 36-104 (Reissue 1993) (§…”
Guynan v. Guynan, 305 N.W.2d 882 (Neb. 1981). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 36-104 (Reissue 1978) also provides: “Section 36-103 shall not be construed to affect in any manner the power of a testator in the disposition of his real estate by a last will and testament, nor to prevent any trust from arising or being extinguished by…”
Fleury v. Chrisman, 264 N.W.2d 839 (Neb. 1978). “or declared, unless by operation of law, or by deed of conveyance in writing, subscribed by the party creating, ... or declaring the same.” § 36-103, R.”
In re Est. of Knapp, 321 Neb. 155 (Neb. 2026). “14 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 36-104 (Reissue 2016) provides that “[s]ection 36-103 shall not be construed to affect in any manner the power of a testator in the disposition of his real estate by a last will and testament, nor to prevent any trust from arising or being extinguished by…”
Smith v. Kinsey, 28 N.W.2d 588 (Neb. 1947). “” Section 36-104, R. S. 1943, provides: “Section 36-103 shall not be construed * * * to prevent any trust from arising or being extinguished by implication or operation of law.”
Andrews v. Heinzman, 8 F.R.D. 48 (D. Neb. 1948). “1943, § 36-104, in any instance where an attempt to erect an express trust must fail before the statute of frauds, need not—in fact, may not appropriately-—be discussed 'now.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.