Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-620 (2026)
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
39-620.
Transferred to section 60-6,131.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1978–1992 · leading case: Krul v. Harless, 383 N.W.2d 744 (Neb. 1986).
Krul v. Harless, 383 N.W.2d 744 (Neb. 1986). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-620 (1) (Reissue 1984).”
State v. Crane, 480 N.W.2d 401 (Neb. 1992). “07 (Reissue 1988); driving left of center, in violation of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-620 (Reissue 1988); and improper passing, in violation of Neb.”
State v. Coleman, 478 N.W.2d 349 (Neb. 1992). “Operation of the Buick violated at least one traffic statute in the “Nebraska Rules of the Road,” see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-620 (Reissue 1988) (a vehicle shall be driven on the right half of the roadway), and was sufficient to provide the officers with an objective basis for the…”
Clark Bilt, Inc. v. Wells Dairy Co., 261 N.W.2d 772 (Neb. 1978). “Defendant first contends that it was entitled to a directed verdict because plaintiff’s modular home was extending over the centerline of the roadway at the time of the accident, in violation of section 39-620, R. R. S. 1943; and because plaintiff’s driver was on a highway over…”
Bourke v. Watts, 391 N.W.2d 552 (Neb. 1986). “Crossing the centerline of the highway, as the Watts vehicle did, may have been a violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-620 (Reissue 1984). Violation of a statute is only evidence of negligence and does not constitute negligence per se.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-620(1) — 1 case
Krul v. Harless, 383 N.W.2d 744 (Neb. 1986). “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-620 (1) (Reissue 1984).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.