Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 39
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.16 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

39-669.16.

Transferred to section 60-6,206.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases, 1974–2013 · leading case: Dozler v. Conrad, 532 N.W.2d 42 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dozler v. Conrad, 532 N.W.2d 42 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 16× “Dozier pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.16 (4) (Cum. Supp.”
State v. Klingelhoefer, 382 N.W.2d 366 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 11× “16 has no application in the instant case. Section 39-669.16 refers to administrative revocations.”
Fulmer v. Jensen, 379 N.W.2d 736 (Neb. 1986). · cites it 11× “On appeal the district court rejected Fulmer’s claims that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.16 (Reissue 1984) is unconstitutional in placing the burden upon the appellant to prove that a refusal was reasonable and because there are no established guidelines as to what constitutes a…”
State v. Young, 544 N.W.2d 808 (Neb. 1996). · cites it 8× “§ 39-669.16 (now § 60-6,206(1)). That ALR is irrefutably linked to commission of a misdemeanor under the Nebraska Criminal Code, by plan and design of the Legislature, only strengthens the argument that ALR "appears to qualify as `punishment.”
Smith v. State, Dept. of Motor Vehs., 535 N.W.2d 694 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 4× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.16 (Reissue 1988).”
Martin v. Nebraska Dep't of Corr. Servs., 671 N.W.2d 613 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 6× “The statute then in effect, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.16 (Reissue 1984), provided in relevant part that [u]pon receipt of the officer's report of such refusal, the Director of Motor Vehicles shall notify such person of a date for hearing before him or her as to the reasonableness…”
Larson v. Jensen, 424 N.W.2d 352 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 7× “Larson then contends, in his second assignment of error, that the 1-year revocation of his license was unreasonable in that it exceeded the maximum statutory penalty of 6 months, as set out in Neb.”
Moore v. Peterson, 358 N.W.2d 193 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 5× “16, also amended Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.34 (Reissue 1978) by deleting a reference to § 39-669.”
MacKey v. Dir. of the Dep't of Motor Vehs., 235 N.W.2d 394 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 6× “1943, from an order of the District Court for Red Willow County affirming an order of the Director of the Department of Motor Vehicles made under the provisions of section 39-669.16, R. R. S. 1943, revoking the motor vehicle operator’s license of the plaintiff-appellant Mackey…”
Bapat v. Jensen, 371 N.W.2d 742 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 6× “Bapat's motor vehicle operator's license for 1 year under Neb.Rev.Stat. § 39-669.16 (Reissue 1984) for failure to submit to a chemical test to determine possible intoxication.”
Hoyle v. Peterson, 343 N.W.2d 730 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 2× “See § 39-669.16. See, also, Martinez v. Peterson, 212 Neb.”
Kirkland v. Abramson, 538 N.W.2d 752 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 4× “Section 39-669.16(4) does not appear to limit the number of times a party may present suitable evidence to the Department’s director to have the license reinstated, but res judicata will prevent the party from seeking judicial review of the director’s denial of such application…”
Show all 29 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.16(2) — 1 case
State v. Young, 544 N.W.2d 808 (Neb. 1996). “§ 39-669.16 (now § 60-6,206(1)). That ALR is irrefutably linked to commission of a misdemeanor under the Nebraska Criminal Code, by plan and design of the Legislature, only strengthens the argument that ALR "appears to qualify as `punishment.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.16(4) — 3 cases
Dozler v. Conrad, 532 N.W.2d 42 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995). “Dozier pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.16 (4) (Cum. Supp.”
State v. Young, 544 N.W.2d 808 (Neb. 1996). “§ 39-669.16 (now § 60-6,206(1)). That ALR is irrefutably linked to commission of a misdemeanor under the Nebraska Criminal Code, by plan and design of the Legislature, only strengthens the argument that ALR "appears to qualify as `punishment.”
Kirkland v. Abramson, 538 N.W.2d 752 (Neb. 1995). “Section 39-669.16(4) does not appear to limit the number of times a party may present suitable evidence to the Department’s director to have the license reinstated, but res judicata will prevent the party from seeking judicial review of the director’s denial of such application…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.16(4)(a) — 1 case
Dozler v. Conrad, 532 N.W.2d 42 (Neb. Ct. App. 1995). “Dozier pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.16 (4) (Cum. Supp.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.16(4)(b) — 1 case
Kirkland v. Abramson, 538 N.W.2d 752 (Neb. 1995). “Section 39-669.16(4) does not appear to limit the number of times a party may present suitable evidence to the Department’s director to have the license reinstated, but res judicata will prevent the party from seeking judicial review of the director’s denial of such application…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.