(1) Section 4-204 shall not apply to the following agents of foreign principals:
(a) A duly accredited diplomatic or consular officer of a foreign government who is so recognized by the United States Department of State, while such officer is engaged exclusively in activities that are recognized by the United States Department of State as being within the scope of the functions of such officer;
(b) Any official of a foreign government, if such government is recognized by the United States, who is not a public relations counsel, publicity agent, information service employee, or a citizen of the United States, whose name and status and the character of whose duties as such official are of public record in the United States Department of State, while such official is engaged exclusively in activities that are recognized by the United States Department of State as being within the scope of the functions of such official;
(c) Any member of the staff of, or any person employed by, a duly accredited diplomatic or consular officer of a foreign government who is so recognized by the United States Department of State, other than a public relations counsel, publicity agent, or information service employee, whose name and status and the character of whose duties as such member or employee are of public record in the United States Department of State, while such member or employee is engaged exclusively in the performance of activities that are recognized by the United States Department of State as being within the scope of the functions of such member or employee;
(d) Any person qualified to practice law in the State of Nebraska, insofar as such person engages or agrees to engage in the legal representation of a foreign principal from an adversary nation or a foreign terrorist organization before any state or federal court or agency or any agency of a political subdivision of this state, except that for the purposes of the Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act, legal representation does not include attempts to influence or persuade agency personnel or officials other than in the course of judicial proceedings, criminal or civil law enforcement inquiries, investigations, or proceedings, or agency proceedings required by statute or regulation to be conducted on the record; or
(e) Any person who advocates on behalf of an individual for individualized immigration relief.
(2) No person acting as an agent of a foreign principal from an adversary nation or a foreign terrorist organization shall subcontract for services for activities regulated under the Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act requiring registration as an agent of a foreign principal, or otherwise induce another person to carry out activities that are so regulated under the act unless such person fully informs all parties of their status as such an agent. The requirements of this subsection apply to any person carrying out services or activities regulated under the act requiring registration as an agent of a foreign principal.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
15
cases (
7 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case:
DeCoste v. City of Wahoo, 583 N.W.2d 595 (Neb. 1998).
DeCoste v. City of Wahoo, 583 N.W.2d 595 (Neb. 1998).
· cites it 2× “That all non-electric customers of the City of Wahoo who are to pay the management fee set forth in Section 4-205, said residences, commercial and industrial businesses, shall be sent a monthly statement for said management fees.”
State on behalf of Fernando L. v. Rogelio L., 907 N.W.2d 920 (Neb. 2018).
· cites it 2× “329 § 4-205(A) (rev. 2016) allows a deduction for taxes, as established by standard deductions applicable to the number of exemptions provided by law.”
Drabbels v. Drabbels, 25 Neb. Ct. App. 102 (Neb. Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 3× “Section 4-205(C) of the child support guidelines provides that a parent should be given a deduction for [i]ndividual contributions, in a minimum amount required by a mandatory retirement plan.”
Schmaderer v. Schmaderer, No. A-17-036 (Neb. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2017).
· cites it 3× “” § 4-205(A). Shawn argues that Todd’s 2015 tax returns show that he paid far less in taxes than allowed by the court in its worksheet.”
Wecker v. Branting, No. A-19-296 (Neb. Ct. App. Feb. 25, 2020).
· cites it 2× “However, § 4-205(F) does not provide for a deduction for “ADD” which we surmise to mean accidental death and disability, or “FS” which we surmise to mean flexible spending payments.”
Peck v. Peck, No. A-20-919 (Neb. Ct. App. Nov. 16, 2021).
· cites it 2× “Section 4-205 of the Child Support Guidelines provides: The following deductions should be annualized to arrive at monthly net income: .”
Peck v. Peck, No. A-20-919 (Neb. Ct. App. Nov. 16, 2021).
· cites it 2× “Section 4-205 of the Child Support Guidelines provides: The following deductions should be annualized to arrive at monthly net income: .”
Smith v. Greenwalt, No. A-23-145 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 2, 2024).
· cites it 2× “” § 4-205(C). - 14 - Karren is a software engineer.”
Lasu v. Issak, No. A-14-478 (Neb. Ct. App. July 28, 2015).
· cites it 3× “” The net income figure for Issak relied upon by the court was $1,729, which was arrived at after deductions for taxes, FICA, retirement, and $318 attributed to support for Issak’s other children.”
Schwartz v. Schwartz, 857 N.W.2d 802 (Neb. 2015).
· cites it 2× “§ 4-220: An obligor shall not be allowed a reduction in an existing support order solely because of the birth, adop- tion, or acknowledgment of subsequent children of the obligor; however, a duty to provide regular support for subsequent children may be raised as a defense to an…”
Consbruck v. Consbruck, No. A-15-507 (Neb. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2016).
“Although the parties did not testify regarding their current retirement account contributions, their pay stubs reflect such contributions. Kayla’s paystubs, Exhibit 6, reflect deductions for “IRA.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 4-205(A): 2 cases
State on behalf of Fernando L. v. Rogelio L., 907 N.W.2d 920 (Neb. 2018).
“329 § 4-205(A) (rev. 2016) allows a deduction for taxes, as established by standard deductions applicable to the number of exemptions provided by law.”
Schmaderer v. Schmaderer, No. A-17-036 (Neb. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2017).
“” § 4-205(A). Shawn argues that Todd’s 2015 tax returns show that he paid far less in taxes than allowed by the court in its worksheet.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 4-205(B): 1 case
Schmaderer v. Schmaderer, No. A-17-036 (Neb. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2017).
“” § 4-205(A). Shawn argues that Todd’s 2015 tax returns show that he paid far less in taxes than allowed by the court in its worksheet.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 4-205(C): 5 cases
Drabbels v. Drabbels, 25 Neb. Ct. App. 102 (Neb. Ct. App. 2017).
“Section 4-205(C) of the child support guidelines provides that a parent should be given a deduction for [i]ndividual contributions, in a minimum amount required by a mandatory retirement plan.”
Consbruck v. Consbruck, No. A-15-507 (Neb. Ct. App. Mar. 29, 2016).
“Although the parties did not testify regarding their current retirement account contributions, their pay stubs reflect such contributions. Kayla’s paystubs, Exhibit 6, reflect deductions for “IRA.”
Schmaderer v. Schmaderer, No. A-17-036 (Neb. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2017).
“” § 4-205(A). Shawn argues that Todd’s 2015 tax returns show that he paid far less in taxes than allowed by the court in its worksheet.”
Smith v. Greenwalt, No. A-23-145 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 2, 2024).
“” § 4-205(C). - 14 - Karren is a software engineer.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 4-205(E): 3 cases
Schwartz v. Schwartz, 857 N.W.2d 802 (Neb. 2015).
“§ 4-220: An obligor shall not be allowed a reduction in an existing support order solely because of the birth, adop- tion, or acknowledgment of subsequent children of the obligor; however, a duty to provide regular support for subsequent children may be raised as a defense to an…”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 4-205(F): 2 cases
Wecker v. Branting, No. A-19-296 (Neb. Ct. App. Feb. 25, 2020).
“However, § 4-205(F) does not provide for a deduction for “ADD” which we surmise to mean accidental death and disability, or “FS” which we surmise to mean flexible spending payments.”
Smith v. Greenwalt, No. A-23-145 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 2, 2024).
“” § 4-205(C). - 14 - Karren is a software engineer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.