Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 45
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-137 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

45-137.

Transferred to section 45-1024.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 1950–1988 · leading case: Ballew v. Assocs. Fin. Ser. Co. of Neb., Inc., 450 F. Supp. 253 (D. Neb. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ballew v. Assocs. Fin. Ser. Co. of Neb., Inc., 450 F. Supp. 253 (D. Neb. 1976). · cites it 13× “Furthermore, it exceeds both the maximum default charge and the maximum deferment charge that could have been collected under § 45-137 and thus violates that Act. C. Additional default clause Transaction II contains a clause which reads: “If two or more full installments are in…”
State Ex Rel. Beck v. Assocs. Disc. Corp., 77 N.W.2d 215 (Neb. 1956). · cites it 10× “That the plaintiff’s amended and supplemental petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against this defendant in that the Installment Loan Act, Sections 45-114 to 45-158, both inclusive, Revised Statutes of Nebraska, 1943, as amended, and *687…”
Kinney Loan & Fin. Co. v. Sumner, 65 N.W.2d 240 (Neb. 1954). · cites it 4× “” Section 45-137, R. R. S. 1943, provides in part: “Every licensee hereunder may make loans, not exceeding one thousand dollars in principal amount, and may contract for and receive thereon charges at a rate not exceeding thirty-six per cent per annum on that part of the unpaid…”
Kometscher v. Wade, 128 N.W.2d 781 (Neb. 1964). · cites it 4× “Except as to those transactions on which an action at law or in equity has been reduced to a final judgment as of the effective date of this act, the penalty provisions of section 45-137, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, 1943, as amended by Legislative Bill 513, enacted by…”
Campbell v. Liberty Fin. Plan., Inc., 422 F. Supp. 1386 (D. Neb. 1976). · cites it 3× “The theory is that since plaintiff was already charged the maximum interest allowable under § 45-137(1), the additional $100 charge made the transaction usurious.”
State Ex Rel. Beck v. Assocs. Disc. Corp., 96 N.W.2d 55 (Neb. 1959). · cites it 2× “” § 45-137, R. R. S. 1943. “No licensee shall directly or indirectly charge, contract for, or receive a greater rate of interest than nine per cent per annum upon any loan, or upon any part or all of any aggregate indebtedness of the same person, in excess of one thousand…”
Davis v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 127 N.W.2d 907 (Neb. 1964). · cites it 2× “§§ 45-137, 45-138, 45-154, 45-155, R. R. S.”
Underwriters Acceptance Corp. v. Dunkin, 41 N.W.2d 855 (Neb. 1950). · cites it 2× “50 as a finance charge in making the loan; that the amount charged for making the loan is in excess of that permitted by section 45-137, R. S. 1943; and that, by reason thereof, the provisions of that statute make the loan void and uncollectible.”
Scott v. Liberty Fin. Co., 380 F. Supp. 475 (D. Neb. 1974). · cites it 2× “The language of defendant’s disclosure comes directly from Neb.Rev.Stat. § 45-137 (2) (d) (Reissue of 1968).”
Robertson v. Burnett, 109 N.W.2d 716 (Neb. 1961). · cites it 2× “60 exceeds the maximum legal amount which can be charged under such section of the statutes. This loan is rendered void by section 45-155, R.”
State Ex Rel. Beck v. Assocs. Disc. Corp., 97 N.W.2d 583 (Neb. 1959). · cites it 2× “See particularly §§ 45-137, R. R. S. 1943, 45-138, R. S. Supp.”
Transamerica Fin. Corp. v. Superior Court, 746 P.2d 497 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “§ 75-67-111 (1972); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 45-137(4) (1984); N.J.Rev.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-137(1) — 1 case
Campbell v. Liberty Fin. Plan., Inc., 422 F. Supp. 1386 (D. Neb. 1976). “The theory is that since plaintiff was already charged the maximum interest allowable under § 45-137(1), the additional $100 charge made the transaction usurious.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-137(2) — 1 case
Ballew v. Assocs. Fin. Ser. Co. of Neb., Inc., 450 F. Supp. 253 (D. Neb. 1976). “Furthermore, it exceeds both the maximum default charge and the maximum deferment charge that could have been collected under § 45-137 and thus violates that Act. C. Additional default clause Transaction II contains a clause which reads: “If two or more full installments are in…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-137(2)(c) — 1 case
Ballew v. Assocs. Fin. Ser. Co. of Neb., Inc., 450 F. Supp. 253 (D. Neb. 1976). “Furthermore, it exceeds both the maximum default charge and the maximum deferment charge that could have been collected under § 45-137 and thus violates that Act. C. Additional default clause Transaction II contains a clause which reads: “If two or more full installments are in…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-137(2)(d) — 1 case
Ballew v. Assocs. Fin. Ser. Co. of Neb., Inc., 450 F. Supp. 253 (D. Neb. 1976). “Furthermore, it exceeds both the maximum default charge and the maximum deferment charge that could have been collected under § 45-137 and thus violates that Act. C. Additional default clause Transaction II contains a clause which reads: “If two or more full installments are in…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-137(2)(e) — 1 case
Ballew v. Assocs. Fin. Ser. Co. of Neb., Inc., 450 F. Supp. 253 (D. Neb. 1976). “Furthermore, it exceeds both the maximum default charge and the maximum deferment charge that could have been collected under § 45-137 and thus violates that Act. C. Additional default clause Transaction II contains a clause which reads: “If two or more full installments are in…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-137(2)(f) — 1 case
Ballew v. Assocs. Fin. Ser. Co. of Neb., Inc., 450 F. Supp. 253 (D. Neb. 1976). “Furthermore, it exceeds both the maximum default charge and the maximum deferment charge that could have been collected under § 45-137 and thus violates that Act. C. Additional default clause Transaction II contains a clause which reads: “If two or more full installments are in…”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-137(4) — 1 case
Transamerica Fin. Corp. v. Superior Court, 746 P.2d 497 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988). “§ 75-67-111 (1972); Neb.Rev.Stat. § 45-137(4) (1984); N.J.Rev.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 45-137(5) — 2 cases
Ballew v. Assocs. Fin. Ser. Co. of Neb., Inc., 450 F. Supp. 253 (D. Neb. 1976). “Furthermore, it exceeds both the maximum default charge and the maximum deferment charge that could have been collected under § 45-137 and thus violates that Act. C. Additional default clause Transaction II contains a clause which reads: “If two or more full installments are in…”
Campbell v. Liberty Fin. Plan., Inc., 422 F. Supp. 1386 (D. Neb. 1976). “The theory is that since plaintiff was already charged the maximum interest allowable under § 45-137(1), the additional $100 charge made the transaction usurious.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.