Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 46
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-750 (2026)

Appeal; procedure

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person aggrieved by any order of the district, the Chief Water Officer, or the Director of Water, Energy, and Environment issued pursuant to the Nebraska Ground Water Management and Protection Act may appeal the order. The appeal shall be in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2016–2025 · leading case: Med. Creek v. Middle Repub. NRD, 892 N.W.2d 74 (Neb. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Med. Creek v. Middle Repub. NRD, 892 N.W.2d 74 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 5× “It sought judicial review pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-750 (Reissue 2010) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).”
Prokop v. Lower Loup Nat. Res. Dist., 302 Neb. 10 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 4× “63 Here, the district court performed such a de novo review and determined that the 4-year suspension was unreasonable under the circumstances of the case and modified the penalty to a 1-year suspension with a possibility of 3 more years if contin- ued noncompliance. LLNRD and…”
Est. of Schluntz v. Lower Repub. Nat. Res. Dist., 300 Neb. 582 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “The statute that does govern here is a provision of the Ground Water Management and Protection Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-750 (Reissue 2010). That statute provides that those aggrieved by orders of a natural resources district have the right to seek review but that such review…”
Lingenfelter v. Lower Elkhorn NRD, 294 Neb. 46 (Neb. 2016). “I, § 3, the State cannot deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Substantive due process requires a determination whether a right in which the plaintiff has a legitimate property interest is at issue and, if it is, whether that right was…”
Uhrich & Brown Ltd. Part. v. Middle Repub. NRD, 998 N.W.2d 41 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 2× “13 [9,10] Decisionmakers are accorded a presumption of hon- esty and integrity, and of being qualified, unbiased, and unprej- udiced.”
Hauxwell v. Middle Repub. NRD, 319 Neb. 28 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 13× “” Primarily, the Hauxwells argued that the NRD “conflate[d] ‘contested case’” as defined in the APA with an appeal under § 46-750 of the NGWMPA. The Hauxwells argued that natural resources districts are not “agencies” under the APA and, thus, are not subject to the APA’s…”
Est. of Schluntz v. Lower Repub. NRD, 300 Neb. 582 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “The statute that does govern here is a provision of the Ground Water Management and Protection Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 46-750 (Reissue 2010). That statute provides that those aggrieved by orders of a natural resources district have the right to seek review but that such review…”
Prokop v. Lower Loup NRD, 302 Neb. 10 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “63 Here, the district court performed such a de novo review and determined that the 4-year suspension was unreasonable under the circumstances of the case and modified the penalty to a 1-year suspension with a possibility of 3 more years if contin- ued noncompliance. LLNRD and…”
Hauxwell v. Middle Repub. NRD, 319 Neb. 1 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 2× “14 See § 46-750. See, also, Medicine Creek v. Middle Republican NRD, 296 Neb.”
Frenchman-Cambridge Irr. Dist. v. Dept. of Nat. Res., 297 Neb. 999 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 3× “Before determining whether the district court’s dismissal of the petition was proper, this court must determine whether FCID has standing to chal- lenge the integrated management plans at issue and whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §…”
State ex rel. Seeman v. Lower Repub. NRD, 319 Neb. 681 (Neb. 2025). “Motions and Complaints for Mandamus Relief Several years later, in 2023, Seeman filed a “Motion & Complaint for Peremptory Writ of Mandamus or Alternatively Request for Alternative Writ, and other Relief” against each member of the board of directors of LRNRD and its gen- eral…”
State ex rel. Seeman v. Lower Repub. NRD, 319 Neb. 681 (Neb. 2025). “Motions and Complaints for Mandamus Relief Several years later, in 2023, Seeman filed a “Motion & Complaint for Peremptory Writ of Mandamus or Alternatively Request for Alternative Writ, and other Relief” against each member of the board of directors of LRNRD and its gen- eral…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.