Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 52-143 (2026)

Obligation of claimant to furnish information to other lien claimant; damages; applicability of section

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) A prime contractor, on request, is obligated to furnish the following information within a reasonable time, not exceeding ten days, to any person entitled to claim a lien through him or her:

(a) A description of the real estate being improved sufficient to identify it;

(b) The name and address of the contracting owner with whom the prime contractor contracted; and

(c) Whether there is a surety bond and, if so, the name of the surety.

(2) At the request of any person who may claim a lien through him or her, any claimant other than a prime contractor must furnish, within a reasonable time not exceeding five days, the name of the person who contracted for the furnishing by the claimant of the materials or services in connection with which the lien claim may arise.

(3) A person who fails to furnish information as required by this section is liable to the requesting party for actual damages or two hundred dollars as liquidated damages.

(4) This section shall apply only when the real estate improvement contract is with a protected party.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Echo Grp. v. Tradesmen Internat., 980 N.W.2d 869 (Neb. 2022).
Echo Grp. v. Tradesmen Internat., 980 N.W.2d 869 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “Another makes a person who fails to furnish information required by § 52-143 liable to the request- ing party for actual damages or $200 as liquidated damages.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 52-143(3): 1 case
Echo Grp. v. Tradesmen Internat., 980 N.W.2d 869 (Neb. 2022). “Another makes a person who fails to furnish information required by § 52-143 liable to the request- ing party for actual damages or $200 as liquidated damages.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.