Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 60
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-578 (2026)

Transferred to section 44-6409

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-578.

Transferred to section 44-6409.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1987–2005 · leading case: Muller v. Tri-State Ins. Co. of Minnesota, 560 N.W.2d 130 (Neb. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Muller v. Tri-State Ins. Co. of Minnesota, 560 N.W.2d 130 (Neb. 1997). · cites it 4× “At the time in question, § 60-578 provided, in relevant part: (1) The maximum liability of the insurer under the underinsured motorist coverage shall be the lesser of: (a) The difference between the limit of underinsured motorist coverage and the amount paid to the insured by or…”
Shkolnick v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins., 506 N.W.2d 356 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 22× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-578 (Reissue 1988), which was in force at the time Shkolnick was injured, stated: (1) The maximum liability of the insurer under the underinsured motorist coverage shall be the lesser of: (a) The difference between the limit of underinsured motorist coverage…”
Johnson v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 696 N.W.2d 431 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “§ 44-6409 (Reissue 2004) (transferred from Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-578 (Reissue 1993)).”
Proctor v. Minnesota Mut. Fire & Cas., 534 N.W.2d 326 (Neb. 1995). · cites it 3× “§ 60-578. An amendment to § 60-578 became operative July 1, 1991.”
Nicholson v. Gen. Cas. Co. of Wisconsin, 587 N.W.2d 867 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 7× “ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR The Nicholsons assign that the trial court erred in (1) failing to hold that under the revised version of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-578 (Reissue 1993), an insured’s own carrier must compensate the insured to the limit of the carrier’s underinsured motorist…”
Waylett v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 401 N.W.2d 160 (Neb. 1987). “In particular, there is no provision in the ««insured motorist statutes similar to the underinsured *745 motorist statute, § 60-578, reducing the liability by reason of amounts paid or received.”
Neumann v. Am. Fam. Ins., 563 N.W.2d 791 (Neb. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “The principal issue on appeal was whether TriState could claim a setoff against its $250,000 underinsured motorist coverage for the $100,000 paid by the tort-feasors’ insurer and for the $188,780 paid to the widow in workers’ compensation benefits.”
Luedke v. United Fire & Cas. Co., 561 N.W.2d 206 (Neb. 1997). · cites it 3× “The district court found that the plain and ordinary meaning of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-578 (Reissue 1988), as well as United’s policy, required that the coverage limits of $100,000 be reduced by the $38,711.”
Horace Mann Companies v. Pinaire, 511 N.W.2d 540 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “Aetna asserted that this settlement, after reducing its coverage of $100,000 by State Farm’s payment of $50,000 pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-578 (Reissue 1988), left $45,000 of coverage for Pinaire, Zipay, and Wilson.”
Bieck v. Allied Mut. Ins., 859 F. Supp. 381 (D. Neb. 1994). · cites it 8× “2d at 360 (applying Neb.Rev.Stat. § 60-578 (1992 Cum.Supp.)).”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-578(l)(a) — 1 case
Proctor v. Minnesota Mut. Fire & Cas., 534 N.W.2d 326 (Neb. 1995). “§ 60-578. An amendment to § 60-578 became operative July 1, 1991.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.