(1) A commission order entered after a hearing shall be written
and shall recite (a) a discussion of the facts of a basic or underlying nature,
(b) the ultimate facts, and (c) the commission's reasoning or other authority
relied upon by the commission.
(2) Every order of the commission shall become effective ten
days after the date of the mailing of a copy of the order to the parties of
record except (a) when the commission prescribes an
alternate effective date, (b) as otherwise provided in section 75-121 or 75-139, (c) for cease and desist orders issued pursuant to section 75-133 which shall become effective on the date of entry, or (d) for orders
entered pursuant to section 75-319 which shall become effective on the date
of entry.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in this section or for rate
orders provided for in section 75-139, any appeal of a commission order shall
not stay enforcement of such order unless otherwise ordered by the commission or the Court of Appeals.
(4) Notwithstanding
subsection (3) of this section, any appeal of a rate order under the State
Natural Gas Regulation Act entered pursuant to section 66-1838 shall stay
enforcement of such order pending resolution of the appeal.
Notes of Decisions
In Re Application of Gcc License Corp., 647 N.W.2d 45 (Neb. 2002).
· cites it 8× “On April 12, 2001, the appellants filed a motion for emergency relief and to compel compliance with § 75-134(3), arguing that under § 75-134, the order of the PSC was held in abeyance while the appeal was pending.”
In re App. No. C-4973 of Skrdlant, 305 Neb. 635 (Neb. 2020).
· cites it 7× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-134 (2) (Reissue 2018) provides in part that “[e]very order of the [PSC] shall become effective ten days after the date of the mailing of a copy of the order to the parties of record except (a) when the [PSC] prescribes an alter- nate effective date .”
Cox Nebraska Telecom, L.L.C. v. Qwest Corp., 687 N.W.2d 188 (Neb. 2004).
· cites it 2× “Any appeal filed prior to August 31, 2003, shall be in accordance with sections 75-134, 75-136 to 75-138, and 75-156 as such sections existed prior to the changes made by Laws 2003, LB 187.”
Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Nebraska Pub. Power Dist., 590 N.W.2d 840 (Neb. 1999).
· cites it 2× “at the NPPD’s contracts with the NCC and the city *486 of Norfolk fell within the PSC’s jurisdiction under § 75-109; (3) finding that the NPPD’s contracts with the NCC and the city of Norfolk were invalid in the absence of a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued…”
Smith v. Andrews Van Lines, Inc., 192 N.W.2d 406 (Neb. 1971).
· cites it 2× “, 1969, provides that the commission may authorize a transfer of operating rights if, after notice and hearing, “* * * the commission finds that the transaction proposed will be consistent with the public interest and does not unduly restrict competition and that the applicant…”
Hugelman v. A & A Trucking, Inc., 254 N.W.2d 412 (Neb. 1977).
· cites it 6× “The protestants contend the order of the commission should be reversed because it did not contain the “reasoning or other authority” relied upon by the commission as required by section 75-134, R. R. S. 1943, and the evidence does not support the finding of public convenience…”
Chicago & Nw. Transp. Co. v. Nebco, Inc., 243 N.W.2d 779 (Neb. 1976).
· cites it 17× “” They then say, and we quote from their brief: “Turning to the statutes in question, it may be arguably advanced that Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 75-134 and 75-137, (Reissue 1971) when read in conjunction, emasculate this distinction between ‘appeal’ and ‘motion for rehearing.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-134(2)(a) — 1 case
In re App. No. C-4973 of Skrdlant, 305 Neb. 635 (Neb. 2020).
“Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-134 (2) (Reissue 2018) provides in part that “[e]very order of the [PSC] shall become effective ten days after the date of the mailing of a copy of the order to the parties of record except (a) when the [PSC] prescribes an alter- nate effective date .”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-134(3) — 1 case
In Re Application of Gcc License Corp., 647 N.W.2d 45 (Neb. 2002).
“On April 12, 2001, the appellants filed a motion for emergency relief and to compel compliance with § 75-134(3), arguing that under § 75-134, the order of the PSC was held in abeyance while the appeal was pending.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.