Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-136 (2026)

Orders; right to appeal; manner and time; advancement of appeal of rate order under State Natural Gas Regulation Act

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Except as otherwise provided by law, if a party to any proceeding is not satisfied with the order entered by the commission, such party may appeal.

(2) Any appeal filed on or after October 1, 2013, shall be taken in the same manner and time as appeals from the district court, except that the appellate court shall conduct a review of the matter de novo on the record. Appeals shall be heard and disposed of in the appellate court in the manner provided by law. Appeal of a commission order shall be perfected by filing a notice of intention to appeal with the executive director of the commission within thirty days after the effective date of the order as determined under section 75-134.

(3) Any appeal filed prior to October 1, 2013, shall be in accordance with sections 75-134, 75-136, and 75-156 as such sections existed prior to the changes made by Laws 2013, LB545.

(4) Any appeal of a rate order under the State Natural Gas Regulation Act entered pursuant to section 66-1838 shall be advanced by the Court of Appeals as other causes which involve the public welfare and convenience are advanced.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 25 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Dunavan (In Re Application No. Op-0003), 303 Neb. 872 (Neb. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Dunavan (In Re Application No. Op-0003), 303 Neb. 872 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 4× “23 Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-136 (2) (Reissue 2018), an appellate court reviews an order of the PSC de novo on the record.”

Cox Nebraska Telecom, L.L.C. v. Qwest Corp., 687 N.W.2d 188 (Neb. 2004). · cites it 12× “§ 75-136 (Reissue 1996): If a party to any proceeding is not satisfied with the order entered by the commission other than an order entered under sections 75-156 to 75-158, such party may appeal to the Court of Appeals as provided in section 75-137 to reverse, vacate, or modify…”

In re App. No. C-4973 of Skrdlant, 305 Neb. 635 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 6× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-136 (2) (Reissue 2018) provides: Any appeal filed on or after October 1, 2013, shall be taken in the same manner and time as appeals from the district court, except that the appellate court shall conduct a review of the matter de novo on the record.”

TracFone Wireless v. NEB. PUB. SERV. COM'N, 778 N.W.2d 452 (Neb. 2010). · cites it 2× “Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the district court. AFFIRMED. NOTES [1] Neb.”

Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Nebraska Pub. Power Dist., 590 N.W.2d 840 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 4× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 75-136 to 75-137 (Reissue 1996).”

In re App. No. P-12.32 of Black Hills Neb. Gas, 311 Neb. 813 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 3× “STANDARDS OF REVIEW [1-3] Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-136 (2) (Reissue 2018), an appellate court reviews an order of the PSC de novo on the record.”

In re Claims Against Pierce Elevator, 291 Neb. 798 (Neb. 2015). · cites it 2× “They reason that in the scope of its limited proceedings the PSC did not have jurisdiction to address such equitable claims. We agree.”

Hoppens v. Nebraska Dept. of Motor Vehs., 288 Neb. 857 (Neb. 2014). · cites it 3× “Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-136 (Supp. 2013), an appellate court must reappraise the evidence on the record as”

Metro. Utils. Dist. v. Aquila, Inc., 712 N.W.2d 280 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-136 (Reissue 2003). Section 84-917(2)(a) provides in part: Proceedings for review shall be instituted by filing a petition in the district court of the county where the action is taken within thirty days after the service of the final decision by the agency.”

Nebraska Pub. Power Dist. v. Huebner, 276 N.W.2d 228 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 2× “Section 75-136, R. R. S. 1943, provides: “If a party to any proceeding is not satisfied with the order entered by the commission, such party may appeal to the Supreme Court as provided in section 75-137 to reverse, vacate, or modify the order.”

G. Kay, Inc. v. Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 361 N.W.2d 182 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “However, Herman Bros. then questions the authority of this court to review an order of the commission interpreting a certificate.”

Chase 3000, Inc. v. Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 728 N.W.2d 560 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 10× “Chase 3000 filed a petition for judicial review in the district court for Lancaster County pursuant to the APA and Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 75-136 (Reissue 2003) and 86-158 (Cum.”

Show all 25 citing cases →

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-136(2) — 5 cases

Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Dunavan (In Re Application No. Op-0003), 303 Neb. 872 (Neb. 2019). “23 Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-136 (2) (Reissue 2018), an appellate court reviews an order of the PSC de novo on the record.”

In re App. No. C-4973 of Skrdlant, 305 Neb. 635 (Neb. 2020). “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-136 (2) (Reissue 2018) provides: Any appeal filed on or after October 1, 2013, shall be taken in the same manner and time as appeals from the district court, except that the appellate court shall conduct a review of the matter de novo on the record.”

In re Application No. B-1829 (Neb. 2016).

In re Application No. OP-0003 -- (TransCanada), 303 Neb. 872 (Neb. 2019).

In re Claims Against Banghart Props., 995 N.W.2d 212 (Neb. Ct. App. 2023).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.