Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 75
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-612 (2026)

Transferred to section 86-135

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

75-612.

Transferred to section 86-135.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1977–2020 · leading case: Hartman v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 249 N.W.2d 468 (Neb. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hartman v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 249 N.W.2d 468 (Neb. 1977). · cites it 5× “This is an appeal from an order of the Public Service Commission granting an application filed by appellees under sections 75-612 to 75-615, R. R. S. 1943, to obtain telephone service in an exchange service area adjacent to the area in which they now reside.”
Jantzen v. Diller Tel. Co., 511 N.W.2d 504 (Neb. 1994). · cites it 2× “Under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-612 (Reissue 1990) and § 75-613, the Jantzens were required, irrespective of whether Diller Telephone participated, to present evidence to establish their case.”
George Farm Co. v. Ne. Nebraska Tel. Co., 443 N.W.2d 285 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 4× “01, the commission held that despite the telephone companies’ failure to protest, under Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 75-612 and 75-613 (Reissue 1986), the applicant was nevertheless required to present evidence at a hearing to establish its case, and its motion was overruled.”
Reis v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 274 N.W.2d 539 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 4× “This appeal arises from an application by three rural subscribers of The Glenwood Telephone Membership Corporation, Franklin and Ruby Reis, David and Susan Fredricks, and Ryal and Virginia Reis, under the provisions of sections 75-612 through 75-615, R. R. S. 1943, to obtain…”
In re Application No. C-4981, 27 Neb. Ct. App. 773 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “1969) for applicants who were not receiving and would not “within a reasonable time” receive reasonably adequate exchange telephone service from the company fur- nishing such service in the exchange service area in which the applicants resided or operated. See § 75-613(1).”
In re Application of Griess (Neb. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “The process stems from legislative authority originally codified in 1969 at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-612 to § 75-615 (Cum.”
Mickow Corp. v. Pierce Tel. Co., 316 N.W.2d 66 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 2× “, made under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 75-612 and 75-613 (Reissue 1976), to receive telephone service from the Norfolk exchange of the Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, rather than from the Hoskins exchange of the Pierce Telephone Company.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.