Upon confirmation of the sale, the clerk of the district court shall certify to the county treasurer the year or years of the taxes for which the real property was sold. The county treasurer shall thereupon cancel the taxes for such years, and the proceedings shall operate as a release of such real property from all liens for the taxes included on the real property. The delivery of the sheriff's deed shall pass title to the purchaser free and clear of all liens and interests of all persons who were parties to the proceedings, who received service of process, and over whom the court had jurisdiction, excluding any lien on real estate for special assessments levied by any community improvement district or sanitary and improvement district which special assessments have not been previously offered for sale by the county treasurer.
Notes of Decisions
Ina Grp., LLC v. Young, 716 N.W.2d 733 (Neb. 2006).
· cites it 2× “” See § 77-1914. The proceeds of the sale are first used to pay the costs.”
SID No. 424 v. Tristar Mgmt., 288 Neb. 425 (Neb. 2014).
“For completeness, we note that, expanding on the theme in § 77-1902, the Legislature amended § 77-1914 effective August 27, 2011, to provide that the sheriff’s deed which results from the judicial foreclosure proceeding passes title to Nebraska Advance Sheets 438 288 NEBRASKA…”
Cnty. of Scotts Bluft v. Bristol, 68 N.W.2d 197 (Neb. 1955).
· cites it 2× “Appellant argues that the district court had no authority, discretionary or otherwise, to grant appellee the relief she sought by her motion because of the fact that this is a foreclosure case, and that section 77-1914, R. R. S. 1943, contains the following: “The delivery of the…”
Polenz v. City of Ravenna, 18 N.W.2d 510 (Neb. 1945).
· cites it 2× “” This provision now is found in section 77-1914, R. S. 1943. Section 77-2040, Comp! St.”
Dent v. City of North Platte, 28 N.W.2d 562 (Neb. 1947).
· cites it 2× “’ This provision now is found in section 77-1914, R. S. 1943.” • The validity of the deed of the county, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, is not brought into question, therefore it must follow, on the authority of the opinion in the Polenz case and the cases and statutes…”
Echo Fin. v. Peachtree Props. (Neb. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 2× “” See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1914 (Cum. Supp. 2014); however, this sub- stantive change is not applicable to the tax deed issued in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.