Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-204 (2026)

Bingo, defined

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Bingo means that form of gambling in which:

(a) The winning numbers or song titles, musical artists, or music genres are determined by random selection from a pool of seventy-five or ninety numbered designators or song titles, musical artists, or music genres; and

(b) A player marks by physically daubing or covering or, automatically or manually with the aid of a bingo card monitoring device, enters or otherwise conceals those randomly selected numbers or song titles, musical artists, or music genres which match on a bingo card that the player has purchased or leased only at the time and place of the bingo occasion.

(2) Bingo does not include:

(a) Any scheme which uses any mechanical gaming device, computer gaming device, electronic gaming device, or video gaming device which has the capability of awarding something of value, free games redeemable for something of value, or tickets or stubs redeemable for something of value;

(b) Any activity which is authorized or regulated under the Nebraska County and City Lottery Act, the Nebraska Lottery and Raffle Act, the Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act, the Nebraska Small Lottery and Raffle Act, the State Lottery Act, section 9-701, or Chapter 2, article 12; or

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases, 1969–1990 · leading case: Kucera v. Bank of Brainard (In Re Kucera), 123 B.R. 852 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Kucera v. Bank of Brainard (In Re Kucera), 123 B.R. 852 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1990). · cites it 2× “First, once the bankruptcy case is dismissed the rights of creditors and debtors should be determined by state law. In this context, there is no identifiable federal interest in voiding an after acquired property clause that is specifically validated by state law.”

Crete State Bank v. Lauhoff Grain Co., 239 N.W.2d 789 (Neb. 1976). · cites it 2× “Section 9-204, U.C.C., provides that a security interest cannot attach until the debtor has rights in the collateral, or in a contract right until the contract has been made, but “a security agreement may provide that collateral, whenever acquired, shall secure all obligations…”

United States v. Pirnie, 339 F. Supp. 702 (D. Neb. 1972). · cites it 2× “The plaintiff’s security interest therefore attached to all the livestock owned by Pirnie, either when the loan was made or when Pirnie was entitled to possession of the livestock, whichever was later.”

Platte Valley Bank of North Bend v. Kracl, 174 N.W.2d 724 (Neb. 1970). · cites it 2× “, and the interest has attached under section 9-204 (1), U. C. C. Since the bank filed first, and perfected first, then clearly it has priority under section 9-312, U.”

Bartlett v. Com. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 433 F. Supp. 284 (D. Neb. 1977). · cites it 2× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 9-204(4)(b) (Reissue 1971) of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in Nebraska restricts the scope of security interests which purport to cover after-acquired property.”

Matter of Stratbucker, 4 B.R. 251 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1980). “§ 9-204(4)(a). However, § 552(b) provides that liens on “proceeds, product, offspring, rents, or profits” of property subject to a security interest continue after bankruptcy “to the extent provided by such security argument and by applicable nonban-kruptcy law, except to the…”

Bartlett v. Com'l Fed. S. & L. Ass'n, of Omaha, 433 F. Supp. 284 (D. Neb. 1977). · cites it 2× “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 9-204(4)(b) (Reissue 1971) of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in Nebraska restricts the scope of security interests which purport to cover after-acquired property.”

Overland Nat'l Bank v. Aurora Coop. Elevator Co., 172 N.W.2d 786 (Neb. 1969). · cites it 2× “Section 9-204, U. C. C., provides in part: “ (1) A security interest cannot attach until there is agreement that it attach and value is given and the debtor has rights in the collateral.”

First Nat. Bank of Hayes Ctr. v. Rose, 330 N.W.2d 894 (Neb. 1983). “§ 9-204(1) (Reissue 1971), now found generally at Neb.”

Graphic Resources, Inc. v. Thiebauth, 447 N.W.2d 28 (Neb. 1989). “§ 9-204 (Reissue 1980). The only limitation on their use with which we are presently concerned relates to the sufficiency of the description of collateral.”

O'Neill Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Putnam Ranches, Inc., 266 N.W.2d 242 (Neb. 1978). · cites it 2× “Section 9-204, U. C. C., makes it clear that consideration may consist of future advances, even if the lender was already under a contractual obligation to make such future advances.”

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-204(1) — 2 cases

United States v. Pirnie, 339 F. Supp. 702 (D. Neb. 1972). “The plaintiff’s security interest therefore attached to all the livestock owned by Pirnie, either when the loan was made or when Pirnie was entitled to possession of the livestock, whichever was later.”

First Nat. Bank of Hayes Ctr. v. Rose, 330 N.W.2d 894 (Neb. 1983). “§ 9-204(1) (Reissue 1971), now found generally at Neb.”

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-204(4)(a) — 1 case

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-204(4)(b) — 2 cases

Bartlett v. Com. Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 433 F. Supp. 284 (D. Neb. 1977). “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 9-204(4)(b) (Reissue 1971) of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in Nebraska restricts the scope of security interests which purport to cover after-acquired property.”

Bartlett v. Com'l Fed. S. & L. Ass'n, of Omaha, 433 F. Supp. 284 (D. Neb. 1977). “Neb.Rev.Stat. § 9-204(4)(b) (Reissue 1971) of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in Nebraska restricts the scope of security interests which purport to cover after-acquired property.”

— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-204(5) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.