Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 9
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-307 (2026)

Distributor, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Distributor shall mean any person licensed pursuant to section 9-330, who purchases or otherwise obtains pickle card units from manufacturers and sells, distributes, or otherwise provides pickle card units in this state to licensed organizations.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1969–1999 · leading case: Garden City Prod. Credit Assn. v. Lannan, 186 N.W.2d 99 (Neb. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Garden City Prod. Credit Assn. v. Lannan, 186 N.W.2d 99 (Neb. 1971). · cites it 10× “The court stated: "In sum, we hold that as a matter of law Auto Buyers did not purchase from a person in the business of selling automobiles and is not, therefore, entitled to the protection afforded to buyers in the ordinary course of business by section 9-307 (subd. (1)) of…”
Farmers State Bank v. Farmland Foods, Inc., 402 N.W.2d 277 (Neb. 1987). · cites it 6× “I fear that the majority opinion in this case may be misunderstood to mean that if the parties execute renewal documents or subsequent loan agreements, the evidence regarding the manner in which they dealt with each other prior to the execution of the last renewal agreement…”
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Bowles Livestock Comm'n Co., 739 F. Supp. 1364 (D. Neb. 1990). · cites it 11× “§ 9-307 (Supp.1988). Specifically, they provided: (4) A buyer who purchases farm products or a person who sells farm products for another for a fee or commission may require that the seller, under the penalties prescribed, declare and identify in writing the first security…”
Battle Creek State Bank v. Preusker, 571 N.W.2d 294 (Neb. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 9-307(1) (Reissue 1992). However, the bank had failed to list milk on a “Nebraska Effective Financing Statement” that was filed pursuant to Neb.”
B. E. Implement Co. v. Valley Farm, Inc., 343 N.W.2d 892 (Neb. 1984). · cites it 4× “§ 9-307 (Reissue 1980). Contrary to the contention of the defendant, a motion for a directed verdict which is not granted is not a waiver of trial by jury.”
Ag Servs. of Am., Inc. v. United Grain, Inc., 75 F. Supp. 2d 1037 (D. Neb. 1999). · cites it 4× “Wolfe, Section 1324, of the Food Security Act of 1985: Congress Preempts the “Farm, Products Exemption” of Section 9-307(1) of the Uniform Commercial Code, 55 U.”
Five Points Bank v. Scoular-Bishop Grain Co., 350 N.W.2d 549 (Neb. 1984). “§ 9-307 (Reissue 1980), which provides in part: “A buyer in ordinary course of business .”
Lisco State Bank v. McCombs Ranches, Inc., 752 F. Supp. 329 (D. Neb. 1990). “FOOD SECURITY ACT The Food Security Act of 1985 (hereafter the “FSA”) includes within its voluminous provisions a section which statutorily abrogates the widely enacted “farm products” exception of § 9-307(1) of the Uniform Commercial Code.”
Battle Creek State Bank v. Haake, 587 N.W.2d 83 (Neb. 1998). “This federal act increased protection for third-party purchasers of farm products by reducing the potential of a secured party’s enforcement of its interest against the purchaser, unless the secured party has properly recorded its interest in an “effective financing statement”…”
State Bank, Palmer v. Scoular-Bishop Grain Co., 349 N.W.2d 912 (Neb. 1984). “§ 9-307 (Reissue 1980). Neb. U.C.C. § 1-205 (Reissue 1980): Course of dealing and usage of trade.”
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. First Natonal Bank of Wayne (In re Ellingson Motors, Inc.), 139 B.R. 919 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1991). · cites it 2× “According to the comments of the *927 Review Committee of the draft of the 1972 official text, the drafters of Article 9, 1972 version, felt that: Code filing should be required for security interests in inventory, because there was no reason that the Code’s carefully worked out…”
South Omaha Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Tyson's, Inc., 204 N.W.2d 806 (Neb. 1973). · cites it 2× “*705 Defendant was not a buyer in the “ordinary course of business” under section 9-307 (1), U. C. C. As mentioned in comment 2, this ordinarily contemplates a purchase from inventory.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-307(1): 10 cases
Farmers State Bank v. Farmland Foods, Inc., 402 N.W.2d 277 (Neb. 1987). “I fear that the majority opinion in this case may be misunderstood to mean that if the parties execute renewal documents or subsequent loan agreements, the evidence regarding the manner in which they dealt with each other prior to the execution of the last renewal agreement…”
Garden City Prod. Credit Assn. v. Lannan, 186 N.W.2d 99 (Neb. 1971). “The court stated: "In sum, we hold that as a matter of law Auto Buyers did not purchase from a person in the business of selling automobiles and is not, therefore, entitled to the protection afforded to buyers in the ordinary course of business by section 9-307 (subd. (1)) of…”
Battle Creek State Bank v. Preusker, 571 N.W.2d 294 (Neb. 1997). “§ 9-307(1) (Reissue 1992). However, the bank had failed to list milk on a “Nebraska Effective Financing Statement” that was filed pursuant to Neb.”
Ag Servs. of Am., Inc. v. United Grain, Inc., 75 F. Supp. 2d 1037 (D. Neb. 1999). “Wolfe, Section 1324, of the Food Security Act of 1985: Congress Preempts the “Farm, Products Exemption” of Section 9-307(1) of the Uniform Commercial Code, 55 U.”
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Bowles Livestock Comm'n Co., 739 F. Supp. 1364 (D. Neb. 1990). “§ 9-307 (Supp.1988). Specifically, they provided: (4) A buyer who purchases farm products or a person who sells farm products for another for a fee or commission may require that the seller, under the penalties prescribed, declare and identify in writing the first security…”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-307(4): 1 case
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Bowles Livestock Comm'n Co., 739 F. Supp. 1364 (D. Neb. 1990). “§ 9-307 (Supp.1988). Specifically, they provided: (4) A buyer who purchases farm products or a person who sells farm products for another for a fee or commission may require that the seller, under the penalties prescribed, declare and identify in writing the first security…”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-307(7): 1 case
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Bowles Livestock Comm'n Co., 739 F. Supp. 1364 (D. Neb. 1990). “§ 9-307 (Supp.1988). Specifically, they provided: (4) A buyer who purchases farm products or a person who sells farm products for another for a fee or commission may require that the seller, under the penalties prescribed, declare and identify in writing the first security…”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-307(8): 1 case
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Bowles Livestock Comm'n Co., 739 F. Supp. 1364 (D. Neb. 1990). “§ 9-307 (Supp.1988). Specifically, they provided: (4) A buyer who purchases farm products or a person who sells farm products for another for a fee or commission may require that the seller, under the penalties prescribed, declare and identify in writing the first security…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.