(1) The purpose of the Nebraska Lottery and Raffle Act is to protect the health and welfare of the public, to protect the economic welfare and interest in certain lotteries and raffles with gross proceeds greater than fifteen thousand dollars, to insure that the profits derived from the operation of any such lottery or raffle are accurately reported in order that their revenue-raising potential be fully exposed, to insure that the profits are used for legitimate purposes, and to prevent the purposes for which the profits of any such lottery or raffle are to be used from being subverted by improper elements.
(2) The purpose of the Nebraska Lottery and Raffle Act is also to completely and fairly regulate each level of the traditional marketing scheme of tickets or stubs for such lotteries and raffles to insure fairness, quality, and compliance with the Constitution of Nebraska. To accomplish such purpose, the regulation and licensure of nonprofit organizations and any other person involved in the marketing scheme are necessary.
(3) The Nebraska Lottery and Raffle Act shall apply to all lotteries and raffles with gross proceeds greater than fifteen thousand dollars, except for lotteries by the sale of pickle cards conducted in accordance with the Nebraska Pickle Card Lottery Act, lotteries conducted by a county, city, or village in accordance with the Nebraska County and City Lottery Act, and lottery games conducted in accordance with the State Lottery Act.
(4) All such lotteries and raffles shall be played and conducted only by the methods permitted in the Nebraska Lottery and Raffle Act. No other form, means of selection, or method of play shall be allowed.
Notes of Decisions
Mid-Am. Dairymen, Inc. v. Newman Grove Coop. Creamery Co., 214 N.W.2d 18 (Neb. 1974).
· cites it 18× “The case was briefed and orally argued to this court on appeal upon the sole issue of the sufficiency of the chattel mortgage filed with the county clerk of Hamilton County, Nebraska, to serve both as a security agreement and financing *78 statement under the Uniform Commercial…”
Brams Ltd. v. ELF Enter., Inc., 573 N.W.2d 139 (Neb. 1998).
· cites it 9× “Section 9-402(8) states that a financing statement substantially complying with the requirements of § 9-402 is effective, even if it contains minor errors that are not seriously misleading.”
Barelmann v. Fox, 478 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1992).
· cites it 3× “§ 9-402 (Reissue 1980) provides, in relevant part: A financing statement is sufficient if it gives the names of the debtor and the secured party, is signed by the debtor, gives an address of the secured party .”
Sw. Bank of Omaha v. Moritz, 277 N.W.2d 430 (Neb. 1979).
· cites it 3× “The requisites of a sufficient financing statement are prescribed by section 9-402, U. C. C. Insofar as pertinent, we quote that section: ‘‘(1) A financing statement is sufficient if it is signed by the debtor and the secured party, gives an address of the secured party from…”
Lisco State Bank v. McCombs Ranches, Inc., 752 F. Supp. 329 (D. Neb. 1990).
· cites it 3× “§ 9-402 (Comment 9). The question then remains, is the omission of a debtor’s signature a “minor error” for purposes of the FSA? For purposes of the U.”
Crete State Bank v. Lauhoff Grain Co., 239 N.W.2d 789 (Neb. 1976).
· cites it 2× “Section 9-402, U.C.C., provides that a security agreement will suffice as a financing statement if it meets the re *608 quirements for a financing statement.”
Allied Mut. Ins. v. Midplains Waste Mgmt., L.L.C., 612 N.W.2d 488 (Neb. 2000).
· cites it 3× “The Committee’s financing statement contained none of the information required under § 9-402 for a proper fixture filing. The financing statement described the collateral as “equipment, *817 machinery and accounts receivable of Midplains Waste Management L.”
Lindsay v. First Nat'l Bank, 318 N.W.2d 275 (Neb. 1982).
· cites it 3× “” It would appear that the reason the plaintiffs purchased the cabin property with a prior lien thereon is in their own failure to check the records or to have their representative do so, and their reliance upon the seller.”
Cattle Nat'l Bank v. York State Bank & Trust Co., 428 N.W.2d 624 (Neb. 1988).
· cites it 2× “§ 9-402 (Reissue 1980) provides in pertinent part as follows: (1) A financing statement is sufficient if it gives the names of the debtor and the secured party, is signed by the debtor, gives an address of the secured party from which information concerning the security interest…”
Matter of Hubka, 64 B.R. 473 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1986).
“52 is an unperfected security interest because the financing statement allegedly fails to contain the address of the creditor as required by § 9-402 of the Uniform Commercial Code and identifies the collateral only as “grain sorghum” with no further identifying attributes such…”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-402(1): 1 case
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-402(5): 2 cases
Allied Mut. Ins. v. Midplains Waste Mgmt., L.L.C., 612 N.W.2d 488 (Neb. 2000).
“The Committee’s financing statement contained none of the information required under § 9-402 for a proper fixture filing. The financing statement described the collateral as “equipment, *817 machinery and accounts receivable of Midplains Waste Management L.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-402(7): 1 case
Lindsay v. First Nat'l Bank, 318 N.W.2d 275 (Neb. 1982).
“” It would appear that the reason the plaintiffs purchased the cabin property with a prior lien thereon is in their own failure to check the records or to have their representative do so, and their reliance upon the seller.”
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 9-402(8): 6 cases
Brams Ltd. v. ELF Enter., Inc., 573 N.W.2d 139 (Neb. 1998).
“Section 9-402(8) states that a financing statement substantially complying with the requirements of § 9-402 is effective, even if it contains minor errors that are not seriously misleading.”
Lisco State Bank v. McCombs Ranches, Inc., 752 F. Supp. 329 (D. Neb. 1990).
“§ 9-402 (Comment 9). The question then remains, is the omission of a debtor’s signature a “minor error” for purposes of the FSA? For purposes of the U.”
Barelmann v. Fox, 478 N.W.2d 548 (Neb. 1992).
“§ 9-402 (Reissue 1980) provides, in relevant part: A financing statement is sufficient if it gives the names of the debtor and the secured party, is signed by the debtor, gives an address of the secured party .”
Allied Mut. Ins. v. Midplains Waste Mgmt., L.L.C., 612 N.W.2d 488 (Neb. 2000).
“The Committee’s financing statement contained none of the information required under § 9-402 for a proper fixture filing. The financing statement described the collateral as “equipment, *817 machinery and accounts receivable of Midplains Waste Management L.”
Lindsay v. First Nat'l Bank, 318 N.W.2d 275 (Neb. 1982).
“” It would appear that the reason the plaintiffs purchased the cabin property with a prior lien thereon is in their own failure to check the records or to have their representative do so, and their reliance upon the seller.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.