Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.209 (2026)

Actions against original contractors by employees of subcontractors or other contractors acting under, by or for original contractors for wages, contributions, premiums, benefits or other indebtedness

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 11.209  Actions against original contractors by employees of subcontractors or other contractors acting under, by or for original contractors for wages, contributions, premiums, benefits or other indebtedness.

      1.  No action against an original contractor for the recovery of wages due an employee of a subcontractor or other contractor acting under, by or for the original contractor, or contributions, premiums or benefits required to be made or paid on account of the employee, or any other indebtedness for labor performed by the employee owed to an employee may be commenced more than 2 years after the date the indebtedness for labor should have been made or paid by the subcontractor.

      2.  As used in this section, “original contractor” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 608.150.

      (Added to NRS by 1983, 1350; A 2015, 1932; 2017, 1210)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2002–2008 · leading case: Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 194 P.3d 96 (Nev. 2008).
Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 194 P.3d 96 (Nev. 2008). “150 as including a private right of action to maintain consistency with NRS 11.209(1), which sets limitations on the rights of employees to sue general contractors for wages, and the legislative history, which reflected a desire to expand the option employees had to recover…”
U.S. Design & Constr. Corp. v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local 357, 50 P.3d 170 (Nev. 2002). “For instance, NRS 11.209(1) refers to the right of workers to bring actions against general contractors for unpaid wages.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.209(1): 2 cases
Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 194 P.3d 96 (Nev. 2008). “150 as including a private right of action to maintain consistency with NRS 11.209(1), which sets limitations on the rights of employees to sue general contractors for wages, and the legislative history, which reflected a desire to expand the option employees had to recover…”
U.S. Design & Constr. Corp. v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local 357, 50 P.3d 170 (Nev. 2002). “For instance, NRS 11.209(1) refers to the right of workers to bring actions against general contractors for unpaid wages.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.