Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 111 - ESTATES IN PROPERTY; CONVEYANCING AND RECORDING
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.315 (2026)

Recording of conveyances and instruments: Notice to third persons

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 111.315  Recording of conveyances and instruments: Notice to third persons.  Every conveyance of real property, and every instrument of writing setting forth an agreement to convey any real property, or whereby any real property may be affected, proved, acknowledged and certified in the manner prescribed in this chapter, to operate as notice to third persons, shall be recorded in the office of the recorder of the county in which the real property is situated or to the extent permitted by NRS 105.010 to 105.080, inclusive, in the Office of the Secretary of State, but shall be valid and binding between the parties thereto without such record.

      [24:9:1861; B § 252; BH § 2593; C § 2663; RL § 1038; NCL § 1496]—(NRS A 1995, 891)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Bank of Am., N.A. v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 427 P.3d 113 (Nev. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bank of Am., N.A. v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 427 P.3d 113 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 5× “SFR next claims that if Bank of America's tender was valid and cured the default on the superpriority portion of the HOA lien, Bank of America's failure to record its tender or keep the tender good renders it ineffective against SFR.”
Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. Saticoy Bay LLC, 996 F.3d 950 (9th Cir. 2021). · cites it 3× “The panel also rejected Saticoy’s contention that Fannie Mae did not comply with the “mandatory language” of the Nevada recording statutes, Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 111.315 & 111.325. It was sufficient that BANA, Fannie Mae’s loan servicer and agent, was listed as the beneficiary on…”
Torrealba v. Kesmetis, 178 P.3d 716 (Nev. 2008). · cites it 3× “Respondents point to NRS 111.315 and NRS 111.320 specifically for the contention that the act of recording certain instruments imparts notice of the instruments to third parties, subsequent purchasers, and subsequent mortgagees.”
Summa Corp. v. Greenspun, 655 P.2d 513 (Nev. 1982). “NRS 111.315. Thus, the duty not to publish matter disparaging one’s title, a duty which was violated here, arose not from the oral contract for rescission, but arose from a duty imposed by the common law, violation of which is a tort.”
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Karmi Props. LLC, 430 P.3d 530 (Nev. 2018). “3116 (2012) shows that tendering nine months of common expense assessments is sufficient to cure the default as to the superpriority portion of an HOA's lien where, as here, there is no evidence of any charges for maintenance and nuisance abatement; and (3) neither NRS 111.315…”
Sievers v. Zenoff, 573 P.2d 1190 (Nev. 1978). “NRS 111.315 and 111.320. Since the trial court’s determination may be upheld on the basis of its interpretation of the conveyances themselves, it is unnecessary to determine whether Bank had a further duty of inquiry as to respondents’ actual use of the easement.”
Bank of Am., N.A. Vs. Sfr Inv.'s Pool 1, LLC, 2018 NV 72 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 10× “SFR argues that Bank of America was required to record its tender under either NRS 111.315 or NRS 106.220. 2 Issues of statutory interpretation are questions of law reviewed de novo.”
Bank of Am., N.A. Vs. Sfr Inv.'s Pool 1, LLC, 2018 NV 72 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 5× “SFR argues that Bank of America was required to record its tender under either NRS 111.315 or NRS 106.220. 2 Issues of statutory interpretation are questions of law reviewed de novo.”
Bank of Am., N.A. Vs. Sfr Inv.'s Pool 1, LLC, 2018 NV 72 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 5× “SFR argues that Bank of America was required to record its tender under either NRS 111.315 or NRS 106.220. 2 Issues of statutory interpretation are questions of law reviewed de novo.”
Sfr Inv.'s Pool 1, LLC v. Green Tree Serv., LLC (Nev. 2018). · cites it 2× “Crestdale 3 SFR also argues that NRS 111.315 and 111.325 required Fannie Mae to record its interest to prevail as against a bona fide purchaser for value, which status SFR claims it occupies.”
Bank of New York Mellon v. Mews Homeowners Ass'n (D. Nev. 2019). · cites it 2× “3d at 119 12 citing NRS § 111.315. Tender of the superpriority lien “does not alienate, create, assign, or 13 surrender an interest in land.”
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Hartridge Homeowners Ass'n (D. Nev. 2019). · cites it 2× “3d at 119 20 citing NRS § 111.315. Tender of the superpriority lien “does not alienate, create, assign, or 21 surrender an interest in land.”
Show all 26 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.