Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 122A - DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 122A.210 (2026)

Public and private employers not required to offer, and not prohibited from offering, health care benefits to or for domestic partner of officer or employee

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 122A.210  Public and private employers not required to offer, and not prohibited from offering, health care benefits to or for domestic partner of officer or employee.

      1.  The provisions of this chapter do not require a public or private employer in this State to provide health care benefits to or for the domestic partner of an officer or employee.

      2.  Subsection 1 does not prohibit any public or private employer from voluntarily providing health care benefits to or for the domestic partner of an officer or employee upon such terms and conditions as the affected parties may deem appropriate.

      (Added to NRS by 2009, 2186)

TERMINATION OF DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Sevcik v. Sandoval, 911 F. Supp. 2d 996 (D. Nev. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sevcik v. Sandoval, 911 F. Supp. 2d 996 (D. Nev. 2012). · cites it 2× “at § 122A.210(1), though employers may offer such coverage voluntarily, id.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 122A.210(1): 1 case
Sevcik v. Sandoval, 911 F. Supp. 2d 996 (D. Nev. 2012). “at § 122A.210(1), though employers may offer such coverage voluntarily, id.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 122A.210(2): 1 case
Sevcik v. Sandoval, 911 F. Supp. 2d 996 (D. Nev. 2012). “at § 122A.210(1), though employers may offer such coverage voluntarily, id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.