Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125.080 (2026)
Trial of divorce action may be private
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 125.080 Trial of divorce action may be private. Repealed.
(See chapter 505, Statutes
of Nevada 2025, at page 3332.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Falconi v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 543 P.3d 92 (Nev. 2024).
Falconi v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 543 P.3d 92 (Nev. 2024). “212, partially based on NRS 125.080. Under this statute and the newly amended local rules, a child custody matter is automatically closed and a family court proceeding must be closed upon the request of a party.”
Jackson v. Jackson, 907 P.2d 990 (Nev. 1995). “We therefore remand this case to the district court for either written findings of fact to justify its decision to deviate from the statutory formula in awarding child support pursuant to NRS 125.080 or redetermination of the amount of child support.”
Love v. Love, 959 P.2d 523 (Nev. 1998). “070 must be based upon the factors provided under NRS 125.080(9). [4] Id. at 320 , 913 P.2d at 654 .”
Burkle v. Burkle, 37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 805 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006). “080 [“[i]n any action for divorce the court shall, upon demand of either party, direct that the trial and issue or issues of fact joined therein be private”]), and New York restricts access to all divorce records.”
Miller v. Miller, 412 P.3d 1081 (Nev. 2018). “Subsection 9 of NRS 125.080 lists 12 factors for the district court to consider when deviating from the statutory amount of child support.”
New York Times Co. v. Dist. Ct. (doe 1 Trust) (civil), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 71 (Nev. 2025). “We determined that NRS 125.080 and certain local court rules, which applied to either automatically close divorce proceedings or require closure and sealing of documents on a party's request, were unconstitutional.”
Nester v. Dist. Ct. (gamble), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 4 (Nev. 2025). “2 Closure in family law proceedings pursuant to Falconi Tn Falconi, this court concluded that NRS 125.080 and several complementary local district court rules were unconstitutional because they prevented the court from considering whether closure was warranted.”
Miller Vs. Miller, 2018 NV 16 (Nev. 2018). “Subsection 9 of NRS 125.080 lists 12 factors for the district court to consider when 3 Though Wright did not reference NRS 125B.”
Mezzano v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada (D. Nev. 2023). “Mezzano may have a support 12 person of her choosing present at trial as broadly contemplated by NRS 125.080.” (Id. at 20-26 & 13 Ex. F). 14 On April 17, 2023, Assistant Clerk of Court Emily Reed sent Shore an email which stated 15 that: “Last week, Judge Robb approved your…”
Miller Vs. Miller, 2018 NV 16 (Nev. 2018). “Subsection 9 of NRS 125.080 lists 12 factors for the district court to consider when 3 Though Wright did not reference NRS 125B.”
Mezzano v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada (D. Nev. 2023). “Mezzano may have a support 9 person of her choosing present at trial as broadly contemplated by NRS 125.080.” (Id. at 20–26 10 & Ex. F). On April 17, 2023, Assistant Clerk of Court Emily Reed sent Shore an email which 11 stated that: “Last week, Judge Robb approved your virtual…”
New York Times Co. v. Dist. Ct. (doe 1 Trust) (civil), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 71 (Nev. 2025). “We determined that NRS 125.080 and certain local court rules, which applied to either automatically close divorce proceedings or require closure and sealing of documents on a party's request, were unconstitutional.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125.080(1) — 1 case
Falconi v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 543 P.3d 92 (Nev. 2024). “212, partially based on NRS 125.080. Under this statute and the newly amended local rules, a child custody matter is automatically closed and a family court proceeding must be closed upon the request of a party.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125.080(2) — 1 case
Falconi v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 543 P.3d 92 (Nev. 2024). “212, partially based on NRS 125.080. Under this statute and the newly amended local rules, a child custody matter is automatically closed and a family court proceeding must be closed upon the request of a party.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125.080(6) — 1 case
Jackson v. Jackson, 907 P.2d 990 (Nev. 1995). “We therefore remand this case to the district court for either written findings of fact to justify its decision to deviate from the statutory formula in awarding child support pursuant to NRS 125.080 or redetermination of the amount of child support.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125.080(9) — 2 cases
Love v. Love, 959 P.2d 523 (Nev. 1998). “070 must be based upon the factors provided under NRS 125.080(9). [4] Id. at 320 , 913 P.2d at 654 .”
Jackson v. Jackson, 907 P.2d 990 (Nev. 1995). “We therefore remand this case to the district court for either written findings of fact to justify its decision to deviate from the statutory formula in awarding child support pursuant to NRS 125.080 or redetermination of the amount of child support.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125.080(9)(b) — 1 case
Jackson v. Jackson, 907 P.2d 990 (Nev. 1995). “We therefore remand this case to the district court for either written findings of fact to justify its decision to deviate from the statutory formula in awarding child support pursuant to NRS 125.080 or redetermination of the amount of child support.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125.080(b) — 1 case
Mezzano v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada (D. Nev. 2023). “Mezzano may have a support 12 person of her choosing present at trial as broadly contemplated by NRS 125.080.” (Id. at 20-26 & 13 Ex. F). 14 On April 17, 2023, Assistant Clerk of Court Emily Reed sent Shore an email which stated 15 that: “Last week, Judge Robb approved your…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.