Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 128 - TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 128.0155 (2026)

“Plan” defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 128.0155  “Plan” defined.  “Plan” means:

      1.  A written agreement between the parents of a child who is subject to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court or family court pursuant to title 5 of NRS or chapter 432B of NRS and the agency having custody of the child; or

      2.  Written conditions and obligations imposed upon the parents directly by the juvenile or family court,

Ê which have a primary objective of reuniting the family or, if the parents neglect or refuse to comply with the terms and conditions of the case plan, freeing the child for adoption.

      (Added to NRS by 1981, 1750; A 1985, 1397; 1991, 2180; 2003, 1116)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2015–2016 · leading case: Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016). · cites it 2× “NRS 128.0155. The action steps in the case plan are conditions "which have a primary objective of reuniting the family or, if the parents neglect or refuse to comply with the terms and conditions of the case plan, freeing the child for adoption.”
In Re: Parental Rights as to V.H.W. (Nev. 2015). · cites it 2× “This recommendation was never agreed to by appellants in writing or approved by the court as required under NRS 128.0155. After appellants failed to comply with this recommendation, DFS again filed a petition to terminate appellants' parental rights alleging that termination was…”
In Re: Parental Rights as to V.H.W. (Nev. 2015). · cites it 2× “This recommendation was never agreed to by appellants in writingS or approved by the court as required under NRS 128.0155. After appellants failed to comply with this recommendation, DFS again filed a petition to terminate appellants' parental rights alleging that termination…”
In Re: Parental Rights as to A.P.M. & E.M.M., 2015 NV 66 (Nev. 2015). · cites it 2× “Completing a case plan for reunification does not prohibit the district court from terminating parental rights Arli was given a case plan under NRS 128.0155 containing written conditions and obligations imposed with the primary objective of reunifying the family.”
Hernandez Vs. Dist. Ct. (state), 2016 NV 1 (Nev. 2016). “NRS 128.0155. The action steps in the case plan are conditions "which have a primary objective of reuniting the family or, if the parents neglect or refuse to comply with the terms and conditions of the case plan, freeing the child for adoption.”
In Re: Parental Rights as to A.P.M. & E.M.M., 2015 NV 66 (Nev. 2015). “Completing a case plan for reunification does not prohibit the district court from terminating parental rights Arli was given a case plan under NRS 128.0155 containing written conditions and obligations imposed with the primary objective of reunifying the family.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.